Technology

37717 readers

427 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

DOJ finally posted that “embarrassing” court doc Google wanted to hide (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My abstract for the linked article

The DOJ has finally posted meeting notes from a Google vice president that the company tried to conceal during an antitrust trial. In the notes, Michael Roszak likened Google's search advertising business model to illicit drug markets in its profitability. Roszak claimed the notes were exaggerated and not his true beliefs. The document suggests Google was able to ignore consumer demand due to its search monopoly. This concerned the DOJ that Google lacks incentives to protect user privacy and innovation. While Google said the notes don't reflect its views, the judge found them relevant and embarrassing. He denied redactions and released Roszak's related testimony. The parties agreed Google could object to exhibit posts, otherwise the DOJ could post them after each trial day.

The DOJ then posted Roszak's notes, allowing the public to read the content at the center of debate.

This comment was generated by a bot. Send comments and complaints via private message.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Good bot!