this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
145 points (93.9% liked)

dogeposting

387 readers
1 users here now

Le place for dogelore and classic doge memes to be shared has arrived. Wow.

Cheems, Walter, Cate, and other Doge-adjacent characters are welcome.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I don't see how YouTube is to be blamed for someone wanting to be popular to the point of eating themselves to death (or any other harmful excess).

This is purely a problem of poor self-esteem and peer pressure.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Self esteem and peer pressure are probably a part of it, but I think money is too. Both youtube and nikado are making money off of what could be considered self harm through binge eating. The company could easily demonetize or ban his content to remove that motivating factor, but chooses not to. (I'm not up to date on the latest drama with this so maybe they changed their tune)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, they are not a public service like roads which are mandated to allow everyone. They are a private company that decides who gets to say what and who they promote. So they are encouraging him.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The viewers who continue to watch him are encouraging him, not the platform itself. 🤦‍♂️

If people didn't consume his kind of content, there wouldn't be a problem.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The YouTube algorithm determines whose eyeballs are on what. It's not like our feeds are 100% randomized.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Does the algorithm force you to click on and watch? Does it put a gun to your head and make you like and subscribe? Join their Patreon?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No it doesn't. The YouTube algorithm determines whose eyeballs are on what.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It's both. Youtube profits off of people viewing him so they have some responsibility. Though I do agree that the sickos watching him contribute and shouldn't encourage him.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Your stupid take would allow child abuse on YouTube.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Meh, give up. Let me spell it out:

  1. Corporations are evil and no one has personal agency.
  2. Person responsibility is the job of the corporations.
  3. Back to point 1.

Darwin might have a word regarding this kinda thing.