this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
13 points (84.2% liked)

United Kingdom

4068 readers
273 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The home secretary riled some in her party by suggesting that being gay or a woman and fearful of discrimination should not be enough to qualify as a refugee in the UK. Her speech was seen as a warning that the UK could commit to leaving the European convention on human rights (ECHR), if the scheme to remove migrants who arrive in small boats is blocked by the supreme court.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Suella Braverman has been criticised by two Conservative MPs for an “alarmist” speech about the need for human rights reform due to the “existential challenge” posed by illegal migration.

Speaking from Washington DC on Tuesday, the home secretary riled some in her party by suggesting that being gay or a woman and fearful of discrimination should not be enough to qualify as a refugee in the UK.

The speech was seen as a warning that the government could commit to leaving the European convention on human rights (ECHR), if the scheme to remove migrants who arrive in small boats is blocked by the supreme court.

Braverman did not rule out such a move, and said world leaders had held back from reforming the ECHR for “fear of being branded a racist or illiberal”.

Bob Neill, a Conservative MP and chair of the justice select committee, told the Times that Braverman’s rhetoric was “excessive and unhelpful”, which he said was “a pity because her underlying point that the world was very different in 1951 [when the ECHR was created] is a fair one”.

Braverman was defended by Richard Holden, the roads minister and a 2019-elected MP in the “red wall” seat of North West Durham.


The original article contains 646 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!