this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
26 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4068 readers
273 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Would cost? No...it wouldn't cost, they just wouldn't get. Cost implies they still have to pay, this just means they won't get tax money on funds that are already taxes. Do it. Abolish this tax then go after the billionaires who pay nothing for life because rich. Get you funds from them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

'Cost' is applicable, because this money is money that has factored into the budget and public spending every year. To make up for not having it, you would need to find or cut the same amount of money elsewhere.

For what its worth, the reason that Tories want to cut this is because it disproportionately taxes the wealthy, and specifically generational wealth. Assets under £375,000 (iirc) are not taxed on inheritance

Cutting inheritance tax will increase the wealth gap and cost the goverment money at a time when vital public services are still suffering from 13 ongoing years of austerity

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You make a good point; if tories want to do it, you can be sure that it benefits them more than you

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Abolish this tax that largely impacts the rich (when they don't get around it with trusts and exemptions) and tax the rich...?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it only kicks in at 1 million anyway, and I wouldn't disagree to it being raised to say 5 million, as it's entirely possible from a regular person to get a well paying job, and have invested and saved their way to that figure by retirement.

But scrapping it entirely removes one of the only ways that we do tax billionaires. One of the last thing I'd want is billionaire generational wealth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It kicks in at £325,000, plus any additional adjustments.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really thought it was higher to be honest. That's even worse. Fully support it being raised, but not removed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There are a bunch of adjustments, chief among them that if you inherit spouse to spouse then it isn't taxed and if spouse 1 passes away without using their inheritance tax amount then you get to use their inheritance tax amount too when you pass away, effectively doubling the limit. Among others, like allowances around your primary residence.

The best thing you can do for your loved ones is leave a Will and a clear paper trail, trust me.