this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)
Personal Finance Canada
1193 readers
1 users here now
Come and discuss anything related to personal finance, directly or indirectly, with other Canadians!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Could you elaborate on that? I don't understand how a standalone HELOC would be more beneficial than a re-advanceable mortgage. The latter typically combines a mortgage and a HELOC under one umbrella, allowing quicker access to newly-acquired home equity since you can immediately re-borrow the money you've paid off.
A HELoC doesn't have strict repayment terms, and usually has a capped borrowing limit. My original mortgage was $200k. I paid it down to $100k over 10 years. I switched to a HELoC (the rate was about the same) and ended up with a $100k line of credit. I paid it down some more, and then received an inheritance, wiping out the balance completely. I lived mortgage free for a few months, then borrowed to invest in my non-registered savings, writing off the interest expense.
To my understanding, this is how re-advanceable mortgages work: the mortgage portion and the HELOC portion are separate. But, as soon as you make a repayment on the mortgage, your available borrowing limit on the HELOC increases.
This separation is useful, for example, when implementing the Smith Manoeuvre, as you need to keep track of the interest paid on the money borrowed to invest.
However, when renewing, the amount you owe on the HELOC might be incorporated into the mortgage, especially if you switch to a lender that doesn't offer re-advanceable mortgages.