this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
276 points (90.8% liked)

News

23332 readers
2910 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A sign hung in Port Coquitlam advertising a “whites-only” moms and tots group is causing outrage online after photos of a poster were shared on social media.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are definitely smart, tech capable racist people. I know. I'm related to a lot of them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sure, but each step you have to take of narrowing the scope of reasonable occurrences re-enforces Occam's razor.

Who is more likely to be a smart, tech capable person? A racist who seriously thinks posting up this flyer is a good idea? Or someone who already manages a social media account?

Each point individually can be chalked up to a coincidence, like yeah okay sure maybe you have this person who is simultaneously tech literate enough to make the nice well formed flyer and setup the centered QR code and setup the telegram account and setup a proton email BUT they are also stupid enough to think this flyer is a good idea?

Thats a mighty specific type of individual, they exist sure but, thats just one very narrow scope in this situation.

There's several more of these weird oddities about the flyer, and when you stack all of them up the whole thing seems extremely unlikely to have been put up by such a person.

Meanwhile, a tech literate person managing a social media account would be very much capable of making such a flyer, setting up the accounts/group, and is smart enough to know that 90%+ of people will be outraged by the flyer and not bother to dig any deeper than face value, and they know they wont get in any trouble over it because no one would believe the people who actually dig even a little bit into it and point out all the weird shit about the flyer.

There's no extra mental gymnastics required for that second conclusion, it's pretty straightforward and it's not an unheard of thing to do, people purposefully putting up inflammatory marks in public and sharing them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

looks like the telegram preview is updated with a more unabashed white supremacist forum link.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh fascinating, the prior telegram account was taken down and the new one created.

Note how the new telegram group was created today, despite the group prior existing yesterday.

I can also personally confirm the "old" one that was stood up yesterday had different 2 posts, different image, etc etc.

This one that is at the same URL still only has 2 posts but different ones.

Not sure if perhaps telegram took down the old group and then someone jumped on creating a new account now, perhaps?

But its definitely a completely different group from the one made yesterday, I should've taken some screencaps of what it looked like.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Nice find! Thanks and yeah, you can see how its a totally different group that existed yesterday, and a new one was made today at the URL

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Occam's Razor, hmm... "Lots of white people are still racist" vs "[5000 word essay on ...]

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"If I don't read someone' response I wont have to confront the possibility I was mistaken"

GGWP

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I listen to bullshit all day, I'm not trying to engage some internet whacko in good spirited debate. I'm taking public amusement at the irony of you invoking Occams Razor while relying on an explanation that requires that much detail

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You... realize that the explanation was pointing out explicitly the unlikely scenario required all that detail... right?

Ergo, that scenario was the one that got Occam's Razor'd? The one that took all that explaining to do?

...because it requires so much work to explain and try to turn into something plausible?

You... you get that right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Your entire fucking argument is that a racist can't center a QR code!!!