this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
806 points (96.3% liked)

politics

19145 readers
4666 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has spoken out after video emerged appearing to show House Republican Lauren Boebert engaging in what the New York congresswoman described as "sexually lewd acts" in a Colorado theater on September 10.

Boebert and a male companion were thrown out of the Buell Theatre in Denver after repeatedly vaping, using a cell phone and "causing a disturbance" during a performance of musical Beetlejuice.

Surveillance footage from inside the theater appeared to show Boebert's male accomplice groping her breasts, and then being groped in turn by the Republican firebrand. In a statement, Boebert apologized for her behavior, which she claimed "fell short of my values," but made no reference to the alleged sexual acts.

Ocasio-Cortez responded to the controversy in a one-minute video posted to her 323,000 TikTok followers on Thursday, in response to a viewer's question.

She commented: "All I gotta say is I can't go out to lunch in Florida in my free time, not doing anything, just eating outside and it's wall-to-wall Fox News coverage and then you have a member of Congress engaging is sexually lewd acts in a public theater and they got nothing to say.”

"I danced to Phoenix once in college and it was like all over the place. But putting on a whole show of their own at Beetlejuice and there's nothing? I'm just saying be consistent. That's all I'm asking for. Equal treatment. I don't expect it, but come on."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Wikifeet is...real? Yup, we don't deserve the internet. Or earth.

Also, why are the feet fetishists some of the creepiest? I don't like kink shaming but why are they so weird?

[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Dude, how long have you been online if wikifeet is what you think puts us over the edge of deserving internet?

You could honesty find at least 300 more taboo fetishes in under an hour without even getting into the dark web.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The tabooness of the fetish isn't what he's talking about but rather the personality of the person with the fetish.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

It's one thing to have weird kinks, it's another to be including non-consenting strangers into it

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If it is as real as you suggest, they really missed an opportunity to call it "Wikifeetia"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

My mind automatically makes "tia" into a "sha" sound, so I read that as Wikifeesha first time.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Idk. With Wikifeetia I am intrigued enough to click with but with WikiFeet I know enough to stay away.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My theory is that some of the men who really enjoy sucking girls' big toe are sublimating their desire to show oral affection to an entirely kind of blunt roughly thumb-thickness object.

I am talking, of course, about cigars.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

TIL I have small thumbs - I guess.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Sigmund Freud enters the chat

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Selection bias. Foot fetish is the most common fetish, and therefore has the most creep.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Which part? That foot fetish is the most common one? Or that the most common fetish would have the most creeps, by nature of of population size?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I think that foot fetish being the largest is iffy. I think it's the most well known and has gotten more acceptable as models on OF and such are down with indulging a fetish as non-invasive as feet. I mean, I doubt they're complaining about having to get another pedicure at a high end day spa that is being paid for by some rich guy in exchange for exclusive pictures. It's also easy to promote on social media as none of them are banning pictures of feet compared to getting a community guidelines strike for just showing a bit of cleavage.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You think feet clock in higher than bondage, leather, lingerie... I'd be super into seeing some figures, because that doesn't mesh with my intuitions at all.

I'd also like to offer a counterpoint to the hypothesis that the commonality is the creep factor, and suggest that it is, rather, the social disapproval that leads to that. Why? For one thing, that disapproval makes it harder to satisfy. Sex is a need for humans in a similar way if not as intense as food, and people will display behavior amoral at best and immoral at worst in service to that need. Obligate foot fetishists, who can't get off without it, have therefore a more limited window for satisfaction of that need, whereas people who have options can get off other ways and don't have the heavy breathing and sweating aesthetic about them in the same way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I honestly believe a large portion of the feet fetish guys are into it because it's weird and makes them an outsider, and less because they actually find feet appealing. I also kind of feel like it's a 4chan thing where enough people pretending to be into something eventually convinces others into just actually being into the thing. Anyhow, feet are fucking gross, thanks for coming to my talk!