this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
240 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37719 readers
106 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Google's becoming pretty terrible anyway, it only seems to return pages that are selling things. I've switched to Kagi at this point and it seems to work better, it's subscription only, but you know you're the one paying for it and that means that you're the end customer.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because last time I checked they just used Bing anwyay, while Kagi runs their own indexer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes but why is that better. For censorship you mean?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's better because Bing may still have selling ads as a priority when building the indexer. If you're not the one paying, you're the product.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You do know it's not an either- or situation, right? You can be both.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's a good point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It changes the question from "why not use duck" to "what does duck really add to bing"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

@eltimablo @throws_lemy @xilliah @rastilin what it removes from bing: tracking, and personalized results. I believe it also adds the bang search, which few if any other places have.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Well they have a sensible business model and can provide another stream of income for Bing from users it otherwise wouldn't reach.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Duck duck go is practically broken. I switched to startpage which worked alright until I got a VPN, then I just started using bing with better results. So it is somehow worse than bing even. Duck ignores my quotes and minuses and such things.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I recently switched to kagi, too. Couldn't be happier.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

New Kagi user here too, been very happy so far. Though it turns out I do a lot of searching and blew through the 300 searches in the $5 plan in like 2 weeks...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I just signed up with them, too. They were able to get me a link to the age of a small, nondescript lava flow near my town on the third hit. (5000 years old! A youngster!) All the other search engines gave me unrelated crap.

I have a hard stop set up for when I hit $10, so I'll switch tiers if it comes to that. 😅

I don't necessarily like paying for search, but I couldn't take ad-driven search any longer. Big waste of time getting through the chaff.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Make an effort to use bangs and I bet you'll stay under the limit.

Knowing I wanted a result from a certain site but using the search engine to get there was a (bad) habit I brought over from Google.

!imdb barbie

!w mattel

There's even custom bangs, which is something DDG doesn't give you: !libgen some book

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@Byter
DDG claims 13.5k existing bangs, and here's a form to add a new one https://duckduckgo.com/newbang
@SoftestVoid

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But they don't allow bangs for sites that do illegal things like copyright infringement. Libgen was my example.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@Byter allowing illegal stuff *and* taking money doesn't bode that well for their longevity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Custom bangs are private to the user. It's not dissimilar to saving a bookmark in your browser, except your bookmarks are hosted by someone else.

It doesn't have to be about legality either. Maybe you like a service that is being protested by DDG for whatever reason.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wonder if the verb Google will stay with us when its origin is lost in history

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm sure it'll still be in the paper. 😉