this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
103 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37740 readers
716 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Mastodon culture just isn't there yet. And it's a bit of work to actually use. Plus "toots" sounds even more stupid than "tweets" and I'm not sure it will ever really take off.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This reminds me of the recent Behind the Bastards episodes where Robert reads the court filings of fired Twitter employees who continuously refer to themselves as Tweeps. At Mastadon they'd probably call themselves Tooters.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Toots is no longer the official term, which has been replaced by "Posts". Toots was always mostly a joke anyway

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is major news. I really hated that word.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be honest, there was years of backlash to the "tweeting" and "googling" but both made it into the lexicon. However it's smart of Mastodon to just move to a normal terminology

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

A normal terminology also helps when explaining the concept of federating with other platforms, imagine saying: "When you join a pod, you can then send toots that can be seen by people in different magazines, even if they're on different platforms!"

I mixed the terminology of some 3 or 4 federated platforms to give an egregious example, but it helps drive the point. If we have a standard (the ActivePub) we can very well have a standard nomenclature for each feature.