this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
30 points (94.1% liked)

United Kingdom

4069 readers
284 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

People aren’t generally sending CSAM using mainstream messaging services like WhatsApp and Signal. Both of those services are connected to your phone number so it’s an unnecessary risk to take for pedophiles. Exchange of CSAM materials happens much more on the dark web and on less mainstream platforms which I will not name because I don’t want to inadvertently aid anyone seeking it. Those platforms aren’t going to give a shit about the UK’s law. So this law wouldn’t even accomplish what it claims to be attempting to do.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So this law wouldn’t even accomplish what it claims to be attempting to do.

That's because "think of the children" was only a fig leaf over an attempt to impose massive state surveillance.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

That’s because “think of the children” was only a fig leaf over an attempt to impose massive state surveillance.

It's always either pedophiles or terrorists when it comes to trying to promote laws against encrypted communications.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely - I know that is absolutely the case. I just wanted to explain that even if we accept that it would be worth sacrificing privacy to protect children, this bill wouldn't even accomplish it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Indeed, they're just relying on your average Daily Mail reader to not ponder this too much and they've already demonstrated that they're hard-of-thinking by buying the Daily Mail.

It'll be interesting seeing the reaction when all the chat groups they are in disappear over night. They'll not think it's a good idea then. Although, that said, I don't know anyone who thinks it's a good idea now. This seems to just be being forced through by a dying government because they can.