this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
75 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
473 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is it akin to the revolutionary code-breaking system from Digital Fortress called TRANSLTR?

I hope it won't.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Quantum computing is mostly a hoax. At least how it is presented to investors and the public. Quantum Computers will maybe be capable of solving a very small set of problems much more efficiently than regular computers, most of these problems aren't of any parctical importance. It is a massive (financial) bubble that is going to burst soon.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

most of these problems aren't of any parctical importance.

Well sure, but one of them is extremely important. Factoring integers rapidly is very useful, even if it completely destroys one of the most important encryption algorithms.

Not that this computer does, or could. RSA is still safe.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, but there are already algorithms which can replace it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I am wondering why we are waiting, if it's an inevitability

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Because security is still a big deal. There are post quantum algorithms, but there are similar post quantum algorithms that have been proven to be flawed. It's important to allow technology like this to mature prior to adoption.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They can replace them going forward. A major issue is that many governments (and likely other malicious actors) have been hoarding encrypted communication in hopes of accessing it once sufficiently big quantum computer emerges.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

"Hoax" makes it sound like the involved scientists aren't shouting this from the damn rooftops.

The economically important problems they beat are breaking encryption (actually counterproductive) and simulating other quantum systems (like reacting molecules, which could be useful). There's other neat tricks they can do but they're underwhelming to anybody who's not a technical person, and it's possible we'll discover more substantially impactful algorithms but it's hard so don't hold your breath.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That’s a bit of a broad strike no? That’s like saying the invention of the modern computing is mostly a “hoax”, all they are capable of doing is adding numbers together faster than a human.

We already know we can transform certain problems that are computationally expensive to be solved by quantum computers. I’m sure more Algorithms can be developed to take advantage of that in the future as well.