this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
591 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

59039 readers
3348 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
591
Amazon CEO Andy Jassy warns remote workers: 'It's probably not going to work out for you' (nypost.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
122 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Amazon CEO Andy Jassy warns remote workers: 'It's probably not going to work out for you'::Amazon CEO Andy Jassy told employees who defy his edict to return to the office three days a week that "it's probably not going to work out for you."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can only artificially raise the price of real estate for so long.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

But if you can only see as far as the next quarterly report who cares?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's actually against the law known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (also known as Sox or Sarbox Act).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarbanes%E2%80%93Oxley_Act

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't see anything like that in the article. Can you explain?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AFAIK the act is meant to hold corporations accountable to fair and accurate reporting as not to artificially inflate their own value or the value of their assets or stocks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think that would outlaw forcing employees back to work. Especially if they keep quiet about the true reason.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I believe I misunderstood the context. My mistake.