this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
82 points (96.6% liked)

CrackWatch

3479 readers
1 users here now

IF YOU ARE NEW TO THIS FORUM, PLEASE READ THIS POST >>>>The Beginner's Guide<<<< IT WILL TAKE 2 MINUTES MAX, AND IT WILL ANSWER MOST OF YOUR QUESTIONS

Welcome to CrackWatch, a piracy news forum dedicated to informing the public about the latest cracks and bypasses.

To get live announcements of the latest releases, follow our Twitter

Rules

  1. No question threads. Read the beginners guide.
  2. Don't spam or post non-related posts. This includes NSFW.
  3. Do not use link shorteners
  4. Don't be rude, racist or sexist
  5. Linking directly to or requesting cracked games and software is not allowed.
  6. Follow the Posting Guideline

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Legally, you might be right. I don't know; I'm not a lawyer and I don't care enough about this case to learn about it.

But I'm not talking about legalities here. I'm talking about calling this person's moral character into question because he decided to go this route, which I don't really agree with. I don't care that it is built on top of Rockstar's code. Everything is built on top of somebody else's code. Again, not talking legalities here; but I don't see a difference, and don't agree that Rockstar should even have a say in this. They should sit back and be thankful that somebody created whatever this is which might just sell them a few extra copies of the game through no investment of their own.

I don't like DRM. I don't like people charging money for what is built on top of FOSS. But I also think it's the creators' right to choose how they distribute their work. /shrug