this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
123 points (99.2% liked)

Antiwork

8271 readers
1 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

💀💀💀

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When a policy has lasted forty years across both parties' having periods of absolute governing power, one can't really pin a policy on a single party anymore.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh come on. It's very clear who the champions and vanguard of trickle down economics are. It's fatuous to "both sides" this issue.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think it's objectively absurd to look at a 40-year old policy and try not to acknowledge that it's been adopted by the Democratic Party.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a story about the UK...

Your point makes slightly more sense if you're talking about the US instead. I still think it's silly to ascribe equal blame to the instigators of the idea and a party that fails to push the tide the other way because of inertia and political expediency.

I mean the centre ground if fucked over there, so you have my sympathy.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I was talking about the US.

It's not inertia, though. The Dems have had the power to make meaningful change several times in the past four decades. Their failure to do so is a choice they've made repeatedly.