31
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I don’t really get the sneer here, he mentions population control at a time when it was widely believed that overpopulation was a looming problem

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

that the eugenics was mainstream doesn't make it not eugenics tho, or mean that it wasn't bad then too

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

No, but Singer does mean stuff like “supply birth control to people who don’t have birth control” and “make them rich and educated so they have fewer kids” which eugenics or not is a real policy response by governments which had to deal with famine pursued

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

singer's a fucking eugenicist though (as any disabled person would tell you).

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Right, so go after him for that!

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

i mostly keep noting that he's not a serious person and should not be treated as such.

this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
31 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

968 readers
3 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS