this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
131 points (96.5% liked)
Asklemmy
43856 readers
1812 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes, but I'd adopt if I thought it was inheritable. Raising kids doesn't have to mean giving birth to them.
That doesn't avoid their concern about condemning their kids to watch them go through it.
No, it doesn't. I'm answering the question of what I would do, not what OP should do.
not having kids means ending your own gene pool litereally weeding out your gene from thousands of year of evolution.
I fail to see why that's bad. Please, elaborate.
Yeah, because my genes, in this case, are debilitating.
I care a lot more about my memetic legacy than my genetic one.