Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Meh, too expensive without much useful applications. Even then it's just a display that you put on your eyes.
Seriously? Secondary display is a new technology? It is wireless but it's still just another display.
Wouldn't hold my breath for this tbh. And again it is not some radical technology with multiple usecases. It's just a gopro with a screen.
Very true. The next "great" technology will not be something that came before. Like prior to the iphone people just wanted smaller phones. They didn't care about screen size. Just look at the phone Ben Stiller uses in Zoolander. That's what people thought the future was.
Bill Gates (yeah boo, I know) said:
This is borrowed from others. It basically means fucking VR is going to be peanuts compared to what we will have in 10 years. Probably will just need to ask the phone "do this for me".
Billy probably learned after his 640kb RAM comment 😆
Regarding your dismissal of AR glasses:
You could've argued that the iPhone was just a fluffed up Palm Pilot or Windows CE device, but with a more limited Apple OS. Doesn't make it less of a big deal, in terms of technological turning points.
Just because a device is merely an iteration on what's come before doesn't mean it isn't popularizing a novel computing paradigm.
With respect to VR, if you think the display tech is all there is to it, you must've not been following VR since the Oculus DK2 (or perhaps you've only tried gen-1 PSVR?). The tracking and motion controls are insanely good. Playing a game with a controller or keyboard+mouse is nothing at all like swinging a sword or aiming a gun with your own body. Even exploration games like Myst feel completely different.
This is all great but there's nothing about AR/VR that poses as a barrier for entry for the new users the same way computers or mobiles posed a challenge.
Computers and mobiles demanded you to explore and understand the technology if you wanted to interact with it.
Now we're in era of ease of access where everything is just a click away.
Honestly, if our generation is going to struggle with a technology then it is not going to be any tech available today.