this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
828 points (96.2% liked)

World News

32285 readers
791 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 166 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Okay, corruption like that should be corrected. Regardless, there's no scientific evidence that aspartame is harmful. Let alone a biochemical reason for why a dipeptide of two amino acids, phenylalanine and aspartic acid, that dissociates in the stomach into its constituent components and some byproducts would be harmful in the first place.

Unless you have phenylketonuria, but you have much bigger problems in that case and, if that is the case for you, kudos on being at an age and capability to read and understand this post, you are incredible.

Edit: Also, just noticed the part about US Right To Know, which is a well known anti-science group that's been pushing pseudoscience and fearmongering about other topics, such as biotechnology, for years. So them being involved here raises questions.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I want to get rid of it because I want a non sugar coke that doesn't taste like burned tar soaked in urine

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Then drink the Diet Coke with Splenda one? There's also Coke Life that has stevia instead. They basically made sure they have a version with each type of sweetener.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Splenda is worse... Stevia is fine

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Stevia tastes just awful to me. I wish I liked it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I find that Stevia has a vaguely creamy flavour to it. Which works well in some instances, and not in others.

Aspartame just tastes awful, for me I get this weird sticky/bitter sensation over the roof of my mouth and turn my throat.

Splenda/Sucralose tastes fine, but has noticeable effects elsewhere, which are a bit TMI.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not better. Splenda just tastes odd. And I haven't seen that in stores in years, and I don't remember liking it the first time around

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Splenda legit causes digestive problems... Aspartame is fine... Especially in comparison

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dude, Olipop Vintage Cola is next level. That perfect vanilla cola without being too overpowering. I love to have it with a great sandwich and chips or dinner!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

This reads like an ad straight from the 60s lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I like their Cherry Vanilla. It goes right through me, though. The apple cider vinegar they use cleans you out. 🤐

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely... Aspartame is safe

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Aspartame isn't only safe, it also goes GREAT with a cold glass of Coke Zero™! *

*these statements have not been approved by the FDA

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I especially like the part where they get away scot free, and the guy is just telling us to ignore them… maybe fire them for the conflict of interests? Ugh.