this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
272 points (91.2% liked)
Technology
59197 readers
3617 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Fuck that shit, that's not work culture, that's exploitation.
So that's what this is about π Enslave workers and require them to be on call 24/7? GTFO with this shit, skills and work ethics they say.
Yeah and TSMC complains about US workers but at the same time keeps opening new plants there. It's pretty obvious what it's like to work for TSMC.
Yup, no joke, thinking about it made me stressed for the people who work there. Damn, must be hell on earth. Yikes. I'm ok with being an IT working from home. They can keep their jobs.
Not much IT work without semiconductors, which is what Taiwan is known for producing en masse. A lot of these decisions to open new factories elsewhere are because of China's constant threats to invade Taiwan.
You know the US government is paying TSMC hundreds of millions of dollars to open plants in the US, right?
TSMC is likely opening new plants in the US for geopolitical reasons. I.e. they open a plant in the US and get some us domestic silicon manufacturing underway and the US gives them security guarantees.
They want to bring their own workers over so they can do exactly that.
Yup, it's kind of sad that that shit is actually considered a "culture" thing. Exploiting workers should never be that. Wtf
What the fuck needs to get done by a chop engineer on short notice at midnight anyway
Or are they just calling line workers engineers to avoid paying overtime
When I worked in electronics manufacturing, production engineers were frequently out on the floor. Common issues were:
If anything major (or potentially major) came up, production completely stopped until the problem could be assessed by an engineer. Assembly workers weren't allowed to fix things and they couldn't estimate the cost of continuing to run a job with defects. Our engineers didn't work 2nd/3rd shift though, so every time a job had issues we'd have to drop it and leave it for first shift. A downed line for 8+ hours is a LOT of money and for a bigger company would warrant calling someone in.
(I think the bigger issue is not "work ethics" like the article said or "need" like you said, but that the US has rules and pay requirements for on call employees)
Call me an engineer and you need to pay me a lot more though so that doesn't really make sense.
I have no problem with that, as long as you pay for what is worth.
I know engineers who had work where their had to be on call like that. However they were doing rotation and they were being compensate for all the time they had to be on call.
From what I remember they were getting 0.3 days of paid holidays for each 12h they were being on call. This was on top of their 5 weeks+ of paid holidays (France).
I think the issue is not the work ethic of the employees, but the ethics of the employer in this case.
Edit: I forgot to say but if course if they are actually called then they get paid for the hours they spend at the factory on top of the compensation.
Our company is like that, but you're not going to get a call every night. Each person in our (small) support group does a rotation of standby one week every two months. During that week you need to be available after hours and have your cell phone on. The upside is that we get time off for working after hours and we get extra days off just for being on standby which more than compensates, plus we get good overtime pay.
We have this as well. One year into it and I have never been called in. The network engineers have been several times, but the pay is compensation for the inconvenience.
That depends on pay and other obligations.
What? Tech companies the world over have people on 24/7 on-call rotas, and it's usually voluntary.
Depending on the company, you might typically do 1 week in 4 on-call, get a nice little retainer bonus for having to have not much of a social life for 1 week in 4, and then get an additional payment for each call you take, plus time worked at x1.5 or x2 the usual rate, plus time off in lieu during the normal workday if the call out takes a long time. If you do on-call for tech and the conditions are worse than this, then your company's on-call policies suck.
I used to do it regularly. Over the years, it paid for the deposit on my first house, plus some nice trips abroad. I enjoyed it - I get a buzz out of being in the middle of a crisis and fixing it. But eventually my family got bored of it, and I got more senior jobs where it wasn't considered a good use of my energies.
Your internet connection, the websites and apps you use, your utilities - they don't fix themselves when they break at 0300.
If TSMC's approach to on-call is bad, then yeah, screw that. I don't see anything in the article that says that one way or the other. But doing an on-call rota at all is a perfectly normal thing to do in tech.
Yeah, but tech workers get paid six figures and TSMC doesnβt want to pay the workers. This issue isnβt that Americans lack the skills. The issue is that TMSC doesnβt want to pay for skilled American labor. In Taiwan they donβt have to. This whole situation is why Thomas Friedmanβs theory on globalization was wrong.
The article mentioned employees being discouraged from claiming overtime, so I do wonder how they handle on call.
A SaaS startup I used to work for tried to implement on-call rotations for their salaried engineers. No additional compensation was offered for the time you were on-call, and if you did get called, the policy was going to be essentially "take the next day off" - when we already had unlimited PTO. I was not happy, and made it known at the time. My manager mentioned that, being in a senior role, I might have the opportunity to excuse myself from the rotations. Ew.
The effort didn't end up going anywhere, but that's been my sole experience so far with on-call efforts in software engineering.
In my experience it's never voluntary. Your shift is assigned based on a rotation and you really can't opt out.
I work in the US and I'm on call 24 hours a day basically doing IT work it's not that crazy
If you're on-call 24/7/365 without a break, and it's not because you have equity in the company, then find a new job.
If you don't, then your health (physical and mental) will eventually force you to leave anyway. I did it at a startup where I was employee #1 (no equity for me), just me and the founders, and I nearly had a nervous breakdown from it, and ended up quitting from stress. Afterwards I decided I would do no more than 1 week in 3, and life got better after that.
we are just a small company and that's the reason for the demand of my time but the way that we do things I don't really work after hours very often at all unless it's scheduled situation or an emergency you can do this in a way that is healthy for employees you just have to have policies that protect the workers
Unless you let yourself get fucked over, you're not on call 24/7/365 and for the time you are on call, you should get some sort of compensation.
They want to pay you shitty for 8 hours and than let you work 12-14 plus being on call for the rest of the day.
Here in Italy "being on call" is a contract clause, it's often a rotation roster between multiple similar employees, and requires extra compensation
It's disgusting is what it is