this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
216 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37742 readers
785 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I had no idea of the size and variety of the Fediverse! It has me feeling a bit overwhelmed. I'm enjoying BookWyrm very much; it's the GoodReads/LibraryThing replacement I've been looking for for years.

I love the simplicity of Paper.wf for blogging. It's truly elegant; I just click the link and start typing. But as far as I can tell there's no way for others to find my blog or for me to find other blogs on the site. There's no browse or follow feature. Nor can anyone comment on my posts! Those seem to me to be HUGE omissions.

Have you used any Fediverse blogging options? What are they like? And what other Fediverse services would you recommend? Other than Mastodon, I've already tried that (it didn't excite me).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Calckey has the superior feature set to Mastodon by far. When the project matures, it'll be a force to reckon with.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is the first I've heard of Clackey? Their website is the most inviting one I've seen with the Fediverse so far.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The project is only like a month or two old, though it is a fork of a more well-established Fediverse platform (MissKey), so it's still building up awareness of its existence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I really liked the misskey that it has custom emojis and a lot of Japanese users sadly i couldn't figure out a good way to search tags or topics.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Calckey certainly looks cool and feature rich, but every Calckey instance's main page alone slows my computer down a lot and overwhelms my eyeballs lol. Don't know what to do to make that better.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, it is a new project, so it probably needs some optimization. As far as visual clutter goes though, I think Mastodon's quad column layout is much worse about that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I remember when it was first launched and it's come a long way already.

AFAIK, the quad column layout in Mastodon is based on Tweetdeck. I don't like it either, but some ex-Twitter users do, so that's neither here nor there.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I use Ivory both for iOS and macOS, and that’s a great way to browse Masto, IMO. When I’m in the browser though, I do use and prefer the quad layout.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

so I signed up for a Calckey account (on calckey.world) but content is extremely limited compared to what I see on Mastodon?

for example: if I search for the hashtag #F1 on calckey the most recent post it finds is from a week ago

this whole federation thing is still a bit confusing at times about what gets federated and where, #F1 is pretty popular on Mastodon.social when I search

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The server list says that instance has 71 users, so that would probably be why. Posts only show up on an instance if something requests them (users following an account, searching a permalink, subscribing to a community, etc). There are solutions to this problem, such as relays in which servers agree to funnel a bunch of posts to each other periodically to share content. You should ask your instance admin if they have one set up, or if they'd be willing to if not. Otherwise, you should make an account on a larger instance, as those tend to be better federated.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

hmm, I guess the responsibility is partially on me to manually find/follow people from other instances to increase the cross-instance federation?

right now I am creating new accounts on all the different fediverse platforms so I can see which UI/UX I prefer, but I would like to eventually use only 1 or 2 accounts if possible

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Following users does help increase federation, yeah. Another solution is creating a dummy account that follows a bunch of users in order to pull in their posts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If you follow folks (shameless plug of myself - like me) on Calckey.social, which is I think a bigger server. That may help! When I moved to Calckey I transferred over everyone I was following on Mastodon

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I need to check it out again. I ended up making an account and never using it. Was just something about it I didn't like, but at this point, I can't remember what. Lol.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I’ve always felt there are just a lot of features I’m not interested in, crammed into Calckey. I wonder if I can disable those as an admin.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

do you happen to have a invitation key to the main server?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't have an account on the flagship instance.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

i ended up going with calckey.world, thanks though. it looks really good too

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

How heavy is it to run? I am waiting for GoToSocial to mature slightly before jumping on to host my own instance, but the only reason I'm choosing it really is because of its lightweight-ness.