this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
685 points (97.6% liked)

Don’t You Know Who I Am?

3810 readers
1 users here now

Posts of people not realising the person they’re talking to, is the person they’re talking about.

Acceptable examples include:

Discussions on any topic are encouraged but arguements are not welcome in this community. Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.

The posts here are not original content, the poster is not OP and doesn’t necessarily agree with or condone the views in the post. The poster is not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

Rules:

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Censor any identifying info of private individuals in the posts. This includes surnames and social media handles.
  4. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  5. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum. If you wish to discuss how this community is run please comment on the stickied post so all meta conversations are in one place.
  6. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  7. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  8. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  9. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

PLEASE READ LEMMY.ORG’S CITIZEN CODE OF CONDUCT: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html

PLEASE READ LEMMY.WORLD’S CODE OF CONDUCT: https://lemmy.world/legal

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 91 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Here’s a little more context. Elon doubling down and linking Uncylcopedia, a crowd-edited satirical website, to support his stupid stance.

[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Nano applies to everything and therefore means nothing. Definitely indicates bs."

What? When will your companies switch from those bs nanometer scale transistors in their CPUs and use down to earth millimeter etching? Make it even more awesome! Centimeter wavelength!

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Electric cars don't need physics! Just money!!!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Real men make their electronic components in scales that third world children don't need microscopy to manufacture.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

We're engraving our boards with hammer and chisel, like god intended us to do.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm starting to think this Elon guy might not be as smart as we all think he is

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

No way! He has money and his own private transportable sink. He's got it all!

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And here’s someone much cleverer than me explaining just a few of the uses of nanotechnology and why it’s not BS.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I appreciate the effort (and the info!) I don't think anyone in good faith actually needs to be told that nanotechnology is real and potentially very useful.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The first reply to this post was asking what nano was so I thought I’d add an explanation with added Musk nonsense. Yesterday I posted in !confidently_incorrect and found that some people didn’t know what “soup du jour” meant in English so I’m erring on the side of caution today!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's absolutely appreciated regardless!

It's always nice when stupid discussions introduced by trolls in bad faith ends up being an opportunity to actually learn something interesting. :)

Also got me googling to check if "soup du jour" meant something else than soup of the day in English - you had me intrigued for a second!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You’re welcome! Someone replied on the soup de jour post that they “didn’t speak French” and I thought they were trolling at first. I assumed it was a well known loan word for all native English speakers, like RVSP, déjà-vu, cul-de-sac, chaise lounge etc etc. That’s what I get for making assumptions!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I think there's a chance you might indeed be overestimating the average English speaker's proficiency in loan words! Good thing dictionaries are not hard to find these days. :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Haha, I saw that post and laughed. I didn't go into the comments though.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

Ohh, so nano does not refer to the Texteditor

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How could anyone use uncyclopedia as a source for anything other than laughs? That's ridiculous. Here's their article on redundancy, as a reference to anyone that doesn't know how intentionally and obviously non-serious the site is.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Some_Hippie

The "natural habitats" are those of me and my college roommate.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is this man the guy who owns the most important, bleeding edge technology company in the world.

We need SpaceX to succeed but do we really want to give this dumbass that amount of power? Oof

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Do we need SpaceX to succeed? I'd rather they get dissolved and everything given to NASA. If I could have my fantasy world fulfilled, anyway.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, get private companies the fuck out of space.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I bet we figure out that launching all these satellites into orbit was premature and we've created a new irreversible disaster that private companies knew about but hide from us since they also control social media now

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

In the case of Starlink satellites they're in a low orbit, and will naturally de-orbit after about 5 years, so they won't really be a big space problem in the future.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Astronomers are complaining about light pollution from them

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be honest I love the idea of the government handling space exploration but (saying this as someone who works directly for a government body) the government is just too slow and ineffective to get space exploration online in the timeframe needed for it to generate new technologies that would help the climate crisis.

It's mostly because of funding and ineffective bureaucracy not lack of talent or capable workers, but it's a problem nonetheless.

In a better world...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

So streamline it and fund it, don't farm it out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I believe the star link internet is very useful for people living in rural areas or war zones like Ukraine. I honestly don’t about the rest of it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"The daily public displays of mental breakdown will continue until people respect me".