Technology

37712 readers

233 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

138

Blocked by Cloudflare (jrhawley.ca)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The author was blocked from accessing a work website due to issues with Cloudflare's browser integrity checks. Despite having credentials to prove his identity, an attempt to bypass the checks by disabling fingerprinting in Firefox resulted in Cloudflare blocking all access. He could still access the site on Chrome, showing the block was based on his browser configuration. This left the author unable to complete important work tasks and questioning how much control individuals really have over authentication in an increasingly centralized web ecosystem dependent on remote attestation. It highlights the need for transparency and user agency in how identity verification is implemented online.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The situation is analogous to being at sea – if you don't respond to calls and signals, you are viewed as a potential threat. Altering user agents doesn't decrease your visibility; in fact, it has the opposite effect. It amplifies the uniqueness of your digital fingerprint, thereby making you more identifiable.

By default, Firefox uses a single identifier for all users, making it difficult to pinpoint individual users, which aligns with the recommended approach as described above.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if you don't respond to calls and signals, you are viewed as a potential threat

This is unconditionally unacceptable behavior and an inexcusable and unforgivable violation of privacy. It is not and cannot under any circumstances be your business what a user does on their own computer while connected to your site. There are no exceptions.

Willfully terminating a connection for anything resembling that in any way should automatically get your domain seized with no path to ever getting it back.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, it's quite evident that you've never had the joy of owning or managing a website. Your perspective is truly enlightening, showcasing your vast experience in the world of cybersecurity.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's perfectly possible to understand how the internet works without being a piece of shit who thinks they're entitled to dictate the software choices of their customers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, that escalated quickly. Thanks for proving my point. Blocked.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Escalated like running arbitrary code on someone else's computer to decide if they're allowed to visit your site?

It's not possible to be an acceptable human being and think that's OK.