this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
368 points (97.7% liked)

Games

17047 readers
872 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There's 0 chance it will be better than their new game (successfully blocked out the title, sorry).

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Their games are from another time, I feel. They are so focused on how they have always made games and somehow proud of it.

They were great when they were made all those years ago, the times when games felt clunky. It was the times.

But Starfield still has that clunk and other games feel way more fluid these days. I don't feel like I can go back to playing a game that feels like I'm playing a brick.

No preorders, probably won't even end up playing it because it will most likely, probably, definately, suck farts.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

I felt like Morrowind struck a great balance between clunk and depth. Skyrim was polished but had no depth.

Something like Kingdom Come Deliverance feels way more clunky to me, but has far less appeal to general audiences than the Elder Scroll games. Although, there are extremely passionate fans of it, so there's obviously still a market for that kind of game.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The fucked up thing is that no matter how bad and disappointing Starfield was, and no matter how bad and disappointing their subsequent games will be, I’ll still buy and be naively excited for Elder Scrolls VI because Skyrim was such a foundational gaming experience 😩

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Just wait a year or two and it'll be half the price or better

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Gotta love seeing CoD and Doom agreeing on this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Half the price or better and also have a massive modding scene which fixes all the Bethesda jank.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Would you want to play it (and support Bethesda) if it's as bad as Starfield? If yes I won't judge you, but if not it's worth it to wait 1-2 weeks. If it's bad and you still want to play, the seven seas might provide a solution...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I genuinely don’t know how anyone who played Starfield could willingly give Bethesda more money for another game. I didn’t even get to the procedurally generated part before quitting.

I also only lasted 5 hours in Diablo 4. I normally play very curated high quality games and finish what I start no matter what, so this was a huge shock to me having two unprecedented flops back to back.

tldr fuck gaming I’m touching grass instead

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Starfield wasn't terrible, but it also wasn't great, very mediocre. I bought the limited edition like a fool because I saw the gameplay trailers and thought it looked awesome. I should have expected there would be very little depth to any of the systems.

Fallout 4 and Skyrim are my top played games on Steam by a mile, but I always play heavily modded.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

A lot of people who played star field didnt pay for it. It was a game pass day one release, which I took to mean they had no hope it would sell well.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I think Skyrim is when many gamers realized this. The quests in Oblivion were better, and aside from that, it was just more of the same.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

To be fair morrowind was full of clunk, many people were turned off by game mechanics, plus generally forgetting to save before dieing and losing your whole character.

I think the problem is they tried to scale up the production to reach more people, which increases costs. They can't make a unique/interesting/quirky game because they have to sell to a huge amount of people or else its a failure. Morrowind likely didnt have the "market cap" skyrim did, but morrowind is full of creativity and choices.

Morrowind sold 200k copies its first year, and 4 million over its first 4 years while skyrim sold 7 million its first week and 30 million in its first 4 years.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's 0 chance it'll be better than Starfield

Thought that read pretty clearly honestly

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sorry. I needed clarification especially since Starfield isn’t very good.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

Actually not a joke, I tried and legitimately couldn't remember. I did remember Shattered Space (since that's a pretty cool name), but not Starfield.