241
'Honestly thought this was satire': Experts scoff at new Trump filing 'full of puffery'
(www.rawstory.com)
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
241 points (97.3% liked)
News
23675 readers
4195 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Douyin content is very similar to TikTok content. There are many popular douyin creators whose content gets copied to TikTok. There's loads of makeup, cosplay, cooking, skit, DIY, etc. Mukbang style content is very popular there as well. Their makeup and fashion content, like on TikTok, is sponsored by huge international brands like Mac and Gucci and others along those lines. Also super popular is pet content, like people who run cat shelters and dog walkers and stuff. There is also no age verification to use the app unless you want to post or comment yourself, and there is no time limit to use it. Some TikTok creators get reposted to douyin as well, but the overwhelming majority of people in china do not speak English, and to post on it, you need to be a citizen of China. Not that there aren't ways around it, but it's harder than it's worth.
I get that you're paranoid about Chinese international political interference, rightfully so in some ways. But this is just blatant lies and fear mongering. I've used the app extensively myself to follow some makeup content creators from China. It's functionally identical to TikTok. Censorship does exist, but it's based around specific events, mostly from what i can tell. I don't use to find political content, but I wouldn't be surprised if they censored content based on stuff like the Honk Kong protests. Propaganda is also on there, most likely, but I never encounter it in my feed.
How often is that true the other way around?
Pretty uncommonly, since you need a valid Chinese phone number to make a douyin account. A few english speakers living outside china get posted there, but English isn't a super common language in mainland China. It's there of course but not widespread enough for it to be much of a market for it. Not to mention America and China are culturally quite a ways apart and I'd imagine western content wouldn't see widespread popularity there.
I'm amazed you do not see the issue with this not being a reciprocal situation. What you're doing is making poor excuses for what is very clearly a two-tiered system, one for people in China where the content can be easily controlled, and one for people outside of China where it can't... but where it can absolutely still be used for propaganda. By, for example, letting "many popular Douyin creators" have their content reposted on TikTok.
And before you start in with me about it, I could not give less of a shit whether or not it's banned. I'm just under no illusions about what the situation is here.
I just don't see this in particular as a two tiered system. Chinese citizens don't use TikTok content is copied over from that platform by other people. Douyin connects with a bunch of the other social media systems created in China, it's exclusively in Chinese and is made for Chinese citizens. TikTok is usable, essentially anywhere else in the world. Douyin is usable in China specifically. You can use it outside of China you just cannot comment or post.
I don't know I'm just under no particularly obsessive illusions about China. Yeah they definitely censor their citizens in intrusive and oppressive ways and that's wrong and bad. So does nearly every single nation on earth. Why would my beef with China specifically, as opposed to American social media which spans the globe and is constantly flooded with western neoliberal propaganda?
Like it's just silly and frustrating the way so much fear and discussions is directed towards China specifically. Like to a wild extent like anything done by China anything Chinese must be nefarious in some way. Fear mongering around TikTok is just. Weird. The same reaction doesn't exist towards reels even though reels censors even more subjects than TikTok does.
And like that's what my initial comment was about right I saw someone say something I know wasn't true because I've used the app myself.
And you know me too, we've talked many times we're definitely not strangers haha. We've been on the same and on opposite sides of at least a dozen discussions on Lemmy before. You can have some small measure of faith that I'm not a tankie here to act like authoritarian oppression is good actually.
It's a two-tiered system because there are literally two tiers. There's one where people can use TikTok outside China and one where people can use Douyin inside China. And content only goes one way. I'm not sure how more clear this can be made to you.
Also, stop making this about you. It isn't about you. I never made any claims about you apart from you making poor excuses for a two-tiered system. And I stand by that claim.
I'm not making anything about me I'm just responding to this general skepticism about the intention of my statements. If I read your comment incorrectly then I'm sorry. I'm also not in the business of acting like this is a discussion that matters to anyone beyond you and me, this isn't groundbreaking political commentary that people are anxiously watching play out. Acknowledging the fact that we've spoken many times before is I think worthwhile within that context.
Tiers implies one is above the other somehow. But they aren't they're two distinct systems. I'm going to loop back to what I initially commented about which was the app itself and how it doesn't function the way the commenter I responded to described it. Why would someone lie about how an app functions? Why specifically douyin, why specifically a Chinese social media app? It's worth examining that decision and the ideas that it fosters about China.
I have said nothing about your intentions. I have no idea why you are suggesting I am. I told you what I said about you and I still stand by it. You are poorly defending a two-tiered system.
Why you are defending it is not something I care to speculate on.
And one is above the other if content only goes one way. Because only one group can see content from both platforms. The other can't. This is some basic logic...
Nazi loving shit
Careful now, the Nazi often gets people banned from all of . world.
That’s because they’re nazis lol
Okay, yeah, your framing at the end there makes sense. I'm not sure how or why our conversation came about that specifically, but yes Chinese citizens are essentially sequestered on Douyin. I don't know that they are unable to install TikTok, but I kind of assume so.
I still think the framing of two tiered is an odd way to put it but I at least understand what it is you're trying to say.
You can imagine my confusion on what I thought was a pretty innocuous comment touching on something most people don't know much about that I actually do and was met with some pretty intense responses from you lol.