Fediverse vs Disinformation

556 readers

458 users here now

Pointing out, debunking, and spreading awareness about state- and company-sponsored astroturfing on Lemmy and elsewhere. This includes social media manipulation, propaganda, and disinformation campaigns, among others.

Propaganda and disinformation are a big problem on the internet, and the Fediverse is no exception.

What's the difference between misinformation and disinformation? The inadvertent spread of false information is misinformation. Disinformation is the intentional spread of falsehoods.

By equipping yourself with knowledge of current disinformation campaigns by state actors, corporations and their cheerleaders, you will be better able to identify, report and (hopefully) remove content matching known disinformation campaigns.

Community rules

Same as instance rules, plus:

No disinformation
Posts must be relevant to the topic of astroturfing, propaganda and/or disinformation

Related websites

Matrix chat links

founded 5 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

239

NYT Panics Over Outrage at Insurance Companies (fair.org)

submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This one's a few days old, but I thought it was a good read.

[...] He dismissed the “idea that the American model of private insurance is uniquely evil and engaged in acts of social violence because it denies people too much treatment,” maintaining that all insurance systems, public or private, ration care.

But as I noted in the earlier FAIR article, the Commonwealth Fund (NBC, 9/19/24) found that the US system does, in fact, stand out among other peer nations, ranking “as the worst performer among 10 developed nations in critical areas of healthcare.” Those areas the US falls short in include “preventing deaths, access (mainly because of high cost) and guaranteeing quality treatment for everyone.” The rest of the world is doing better than us on these scores, contrary to Douthat.

Americans see the systems working in the rest of the world and know that the United States could have a better healthcare regime, but that corporate and government leaders simply choose not to.

Visit us @ [email protected] for all the latest news on the topics of astroturfing, propaganda and disinformation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's a misunderstanding purposely spread by conservatives, (no clue if this person is just misinformed or what), but they use several lies to make people think they can't afford to get rid of the current system. They tell them they'll pay more taxes, without mentioning that their tax increase will be less than their current premiums; which means there's a savings there. They also tell them their employer pays for a good chunk and if we get rid of the current system that will all be on them, which isn't true because we can tax the corporations, and the corporations will see the same savings as people do. Finally they always use numbers that include the highest coverage in the current system, to blow the total cost way up. This hides all of the efficiency savings with the government acting as the only payment negotiator for most services and getting rid of the profit motive.

By the time Fox News is done with people they're sure they would go bankrupt if we tried to switch systems.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also the money is usually not collected in taxes. Social securities are seperate entities and you just pay an obligatory insurance rate, which as you said would he much lower for the Americans compared to their private insurance system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

In the US we collect a special tax.