this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
391 points (98.5% liked)

Pleasant Politics

233 readers
573 users here now

Politics without the jerks.

This community is watched over by a ruthless robot moderator to keep out bad actors. I don't know if it will work. Read !santabot@slrpnk.net for a full explanation. The short version is don't be a net negative to the community and you can post here.

Rules

Post political news, your own opinions, or discussion. Anything goes.

All posts must follow the slrpnk sitewide rules.

No personal attacks, no bigotry, no spam. Those will get a manual temporary ban.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 99 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

It's really very simple:

On one side, there's integrity and convictions and serving the interests of the American people.

And on the other side, there's a handful of corporations and wealthy individuals who will give them money in exchange for protecting their privilege.

And the Democrats have chosen the money

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 71 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

As have the republicans. So now there are no political options for addressing the material concerns of the working class.

BOLD MOVE COTTON

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 29 points 14 hours ago

At least it's on-brand for R. D still tries to pretend otherwise.

So now there are no political options for addressing the material concerns of the working class.

BOLD MOVE COTTON

Good point, that didn't go well last time did it? Those who forget history...

Looks like our politicians are going to be doomed to repeat it.

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Oh there are options. We just have to add a little checkbox beneath A or B ourselves. After all, revisions exist for a reason.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Hippity hoppity abolish private property

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Swiggity swooty protect each civic duty

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

And the Democrats have chosen the money

and we will vote for them anyways in 2028

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

No, no, not all of us will.

I'm done with them. I'll either find a party or individual I can support in each seat, or I'll stay the fuck home. Not wasting my fucking time if I can't find someone that actually aligns with my views any more. Those circles will just stay blank, and I'll only vote in local elections, and even that only if I actually support the candidate.

Soap and ballot boxes have failed too hard.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 hours ago

Not wasting my fucking time if I can't find someone that actually aligns with my views any more.

As the DNC is unlikely to ever allow that, and with no sign of approval voting ever being implemented to break the 2 party death grip, it would seem that the only option left is solving problems ourselves collectively with mutual aid and direct action, without waiting for the DNC to purge itself of corpos.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 hours ago

... I’ll either find a party or individual I can support in each seat, or I’ll stay the fuck home...

that's why harris lost the election.

americans refuse to read and that results in this charade of a democratic system that requires us to vote democrat or republican; they will call you a fool for not playing along or actively standing up for your principals like a 3rd party vote.

like the abolitionists and suffragettes; it's going to take a generations long cultural shift for things to improve and i think that the biggest indicator is when people start to prefer reading over watching tv.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

I'm sure that's part of it, but I also think there's a fair bit of rolling over to protect whatever power they get left with.

I'm sure we'll see lots of press releases expressing deep concern again.