this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
568 points (93.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9788 readers
1412 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just look at that. This truck is taller than a used kid (10 years old). I assume the truck can run over pretty much any other age but probably the driver might be able to see older kid's heads. Or we could teach our kids to jump to school rather than walk. If you see a truck, jump and make eye contact before jumping while crossing the street. Or we could tell our kids to never go outside until they are 21.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Oh you mean the new kid regulations requiring stilts and helmets to bring your kids outside? We probably also need new construction regulations to required bollards along the side of the property facing the street so as to prevent damage to trucks if the house happens to get too close.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 40 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This one.

There's a link to the proposed rule in the first paragraph. Note the diagrams on page 35, page 51, then page 84. They're working on it. NHTSA is slow, and they won't be allowed to finish.

You can comment here if you'd like to actually do something besides be snarky on a website nobody reads.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

In other news, NHTSA with the help of major manufacturers has determined the typical height of a ten year old is eight feet tall. Personal vehicles will be mandated to be able to see people of this height over the hood

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No stilts and helmets, that would be silly. The regulations require jumping up and down like a frog to stay visible, but also you’re entirely responsible to crossy the road while cars and trucks continue at speed

[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

So, no change?

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Probably going to require front-facing camera. Similar to how they dealt with the rear visibility issue.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

IE one more screen based thing to distract from the fact that other humans exist.

Rear cameras make sense and help people who might no be tall enough or flexible enough to twist and look out the rear window.

But the front camera will be a distraction from lying proper attention while driving forward.

We need more vans really, but consumers (who can afford the fucking things) are too insecure to drive anything that might make their wieners look small.