this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
46 points (97.9% liked)

LGBTQ+

2762 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Sometimes they must necessarily be excluded. You just referred to trans people without referring to bi people. Were you "excluding" bi people? Well, in the sense of the word that you just (perhaps unintentionally) used, yes, you just excluded them. And it was okay. Because you weren't talking about bi people. So it was okay to say "trans" instead of "2SLGBTQ+". Because you were speaking specifically about trans people and that is OKAY. So what would you have me say when I am specifically talking about lesbian, gay, and bisexual people but not trans people??!!

You're so hung up on dogma and culture warring that you're not using your brain.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

what do you think the b in lgbtq+ is?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

You didn't say "lgbtq+". You wrote:

trans people

You said "trans". Stop excluding bi people. Don't say "trans" say "2slgbtq+".

^^^ that's you

I have to think you are arguing in bad faith at this point.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

this is literally my entire post

they could start by not excluding trans people. you refer to them just like i said; the lgbtq+ community