this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
766 points (93.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9785 readers
899 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: to clarify: the message in the ad is actually ironic/satirical, mocking the advice for cyclists to wear high-viz at night.

It uses the same logic but inverts the parts and responsabilities, by suggesting to motorists (not cyclists) to apply bright paint on their cars.

So this ad is not pro or against high-viz, it's against victim blaming

Cross-posted from: https://mastodon.uno/users/rivoluzioneurbanamobilita/statuses/113544508246569296

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sepiroth154@feddit.nl 26 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Bikes have lights too though?

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

That is not a requirement, you to have to have front and rear reflectors, I don't remember if side reflectors are required or not.

One thing that a lot of bikes has that is illegal here but ignored by the police, is a flashing front light.

Rear lights can absolutely be flashing, but front lights can't.

[–] sepiroth154@feddit.nl 31 points 3 weeks ago

Depends on the country you live in 😂 here they are absolutely required and also are not allowed to be blinking.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They are actually required at night. https://www.transportstyrelsen.se/sv/vagtrafik/Trafikregler/Cyklist-mopedist-motorcyklist/Trafikregler/Regler-for-cykel/

Reflectors are also required.

And yeah the rear light are allowed to flash.

I still agree that cars are way more visible.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That is not a requirement

It is, actually: https://www.transportstyrelsen.se/sv/vagtrafik/trafikregler/cyklist-mopedist-motorcyklist/trafikregler/regler-for-cykel/

You're liable to pay 500 SEK if you bike without lights when it's dark outside.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

Ah, nice, I didn't know that!

[–] aulin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The front lights are allowed to flash in Denmark and it's super annoying, and dangerous in my opinion. The lowest allowed blinking frequency is also way lower than rear lights in Sweden, so it's like being flashed by a camera repeatedly.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I still don't understand why lights even have a flashing option

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

I assume it's to catch people's attention better

I find them annoying but I also used to find DRLs annoying and now I'm in favor of them as good safety, and I've not looked into the safety of flashing lights so I avoid taking a side on that one for now

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As others have said, this depends on the jurisdiction.

In the UK, you have to have lights on at night: white at the front, red at the back. They can either be steady or blinking.

[–] oo1@lemmings.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think you're also supposed to have orange reflectors on pedals which is consistent with orange flashers for slow traffic.

but I find it hard to buy decent pedals that actually met this requirement.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, particularly difficult with clipless pedals, such that strictly speaking I think it's illegal to ride at night with them!

[–] DV8@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

In Belgium at least they are required (reflectors aren't on all styles of bikes), problem is that cyclists often have battery powered lights which are not very bright to the point you could say they are not even working. And in my experience it really renders cyclists invisible at night until you almost run into them.

In that sense high-viz vests definitely help because they usually make them stand out more than even normal lights.

Ofcourse this is mostly needed in the places with no separate infrastructure and no street lights. (Edit: which is what the situation is in near where I live, the shortest route to bike is through farmlands with no infrastructure for bikes and no streetlight ms for sections of it. I'd personally love better and separate infrastructure since it's basically part of the reason why avoid biking there during the lang dark winter)

[–] art@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

In California (Well, at least in LA County) it's required by law for cyclists riding at night to have a bell, headlight, and reflectors. Different parts of the world are different though.

Source: Got a ticket once for no headlight.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Their visibility is quite different tho

[–] sepiroth154@feddit.nl 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

So is their mortality rate when they hit a pedestrian, and their speed.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 1 points 3 weeks ago

And what would be the point of your comment? The lights on a bike are for protecting the bike from cars, not pedestrians from bikes.