this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
146 points (98.7% liked)

Europe

1556 readers
382 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

High costs cited as the main reason for piracy acceptance

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Anybody is perfectly free to boycott any product. But piracy doesn't feel right towards content creators. Heck, streaming services are dirty cheap these days and if you can't pay 10€ or so per month, well, you're cheap.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Heck, streaming services are dirty cheap these days and if you can’t pay 10€ or so per month, well, you’re cheap.

Yeah, it's not about the money. The amount I spent on my personal media server could sign me up for almost every streaming services in existance ... for a decade or so.

But piracy doesn’t feel right towards content creators

I agree .. when it's like a indie creator with a few thousand youtube followers or something. I like patreon for that (and spending way too much on that, too).

But if the creators are like hollywood millionaires or studios run by massive corporations? Well, fuck'em! Hell, I wish piracy was actually stealing so I could actually financially hurt them.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

TBH, I'm sceptical about fairness to content creators. Spotify for example is paying exactly nothing to your favourite artists. They get around 2-3€ per 1000 streams, which means that you can listen to them quite a lot without them getting rich. Go to some concerts, they will get more money than from spotify

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Spotify's incentives also work to make new music worse. People now release "albums" with a large number of short, low-quality tracks (because each stream above the length threshold pays the same), with only one or two songs that are standouts (to gain entry into Spotify playlists which are the major discovery mechanism). It's also been proven that Spotify artificially increases the field of your competition by contracting out lowish-quality original compositions in some cases, for which they get to keep all the royalties.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

This was already the case, well before digital music streaming: go look at music albums from the 90s and before that, and they're overwhelmingly 2 or 3 good tracks and the rest filler.

Only a few of the greatest artists would mainly escape this trend and often only in a few of their albums, and there are plenty of one-hit-wonders who only ever produced one successful album with only one popular track in it and the rest pretty much filler.

It's not by chance that even in the music disc days, there was the LP (i.e. an album) and the Single that only had a couple of the best tracks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

You're right, the tendency for catchy singles did exist already. But still, I'd argue it used to make more sense to put work in a 30-/45-minute album worth listening to than it does now.

Anywho... *proceeds to yell at clouds*

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, they are quite shitty. OTOH if you pirate music then artists get 0.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes. If it were just that, I'd be fine with it. But on top of paying them, every streaming service has their own app, website, whatever structure and I lose the priviledge of having my own digital library with my own search function integrated into my home automation and if we see that as a luxury, alright, then they're giving me 720p maximum because my computer doesn't match whatever they want me to buy and use for consuming their offers.

Piracy is a convenience problem, not a money problem.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Netflix removed Star Trek Discovery from one season to the next. Paramount wanted to have all Star Trek on their streaming service. Sure, I could have just switched to Paramount but just for that one series? Nah, just pirated it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What makes you think that you are entitled to all that for free? Want to own stuff? Then buy physical media and there is also Bandcamp for music. Don't want any of this? Then don't listen or watch.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

We are all playing a board game where the rules say billionaires win every time. You either keep pretending that our society is just and keeping to the rules the capitalist class wrote is good for society, or you can also realize that everyone does what they can get away with and the "lost profits" of Netflix et al. are just as much collateral damage as homeless people we refuse to house because REIT line go up.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Netflix enshittified their service over time for Linux users. So they reduced their service while increasing prices and thus I enshittified my payments by stopping them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago

Nothing wrong with not paying a service you don't want.