solarpunk memes

3004 readers

238 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

ex_06@slrpnk.net

tsugu@slrpnk.net

Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net

361

The masculine urge to nuclear project posting (slrpnk.net)

submitted 4 weeks ago by ecoenginefutures@slrpnk.net to c/memes@slrpnk.net

65 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] denaggels@feddit.org 13 points 3 weeks ago (32 children)

Do we have a solution for nuclear waste yet?

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 37 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Reprocess it, salvage useful isotopes for known uses, keep a few others for research purposes, don't put it too far away because most of it could be useful in the future.

[–] denaggels@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Afaik that is not an economically viable option.

[–] Fosheze@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

France literally does that. They reprocess 96% all of their used fuel back into usable fuel and useful materials.

[–] gnygnygny@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

The number is false. You make a confusion between what could be recycled and what is actually recycled. And MOX is not a good option (expensive, 1 cycle, toxicity).

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Which part? France is basically doing this already.

[–] gnygnygny@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

Economically it's not interesting
It's one cycle only
Waste in output is even worst and more toxic

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah yes, economically viable like destroying the planet.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If destroying the planet weren't economically viable, no one would do it.

This has been your daily depressing fact.

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

My point exactly.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 7 points 3 weeks ago

clutches pearls won't someone think of the stock market?

load more comments (4 replies)

load more comments (26 replies)