this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
914 points (98.2% liked)

People Twitter

5220 readers
1846 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (3 children)

I have a friend who works at a major bank and they use Blockchain technology to keep track of something or other internally, though I don't remember exactly what. In this case at keast we can bet that it has found a problem wirth using it to sokve. Banks are nothing if not efficient.

I find it funny that it was touted as an alternative to the current banking system and ended up being absorved into it though

[–] [email protected] 7 points 23 hours ago

I envy your trust in the efficiency of banks

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Banks are nothing if not efficient.

Banks are businesses made up of people. If a manager thought he could get a promotion by supporting a blockchain project at the height of blockchain mania, that's what he would do. Whether if fails or not is of no consequence, the manager is already on another project.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

My experience working in banking is that they're extremely conservative. They don't take big risks on new technologies or processes and don't modernize their technology too quickly to be certain that everything works as expected and doesn't surprise anyone

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago

If it's used internally, then I question whether it made sense to use blockchain. At the end of the day, it's probably the trust in the bank that matters and not blockchain.