this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
303 points (92.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

29693 readers
1727 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A lot less annoying then endlessly filtering content by community and user

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 week ago (11 children)

The downside of that is the filter bubble or echo chamber effect. Question is whether Lemmy should be a fun experience for you or something to broaden your horizons a little

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can listen to people try to convince you that Russia's war is justified and that Tienamen Square never happened for a while if you want, then make up your mind and block them later ;-).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It was super fun to be gaslit by people while I was actually living in Taiwan but yeah, gets old after a while.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean, personally I am not here to discuss politics or get the news. I'm here for memes and nerding out. All that real-world shit doesn't vibe. I wanna laugh.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Exactly. I want to be able to mention the fashion lizard, the bisexual twink doctor, and his husband the suffering Irishman... And for people to understand who I'm talking about.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I agree, the filters here are great. I don't mind the real world stuff but I filter your instance because I don't want to see furry porn.

(Not trying to be snarky, your kinks are not any of my business, hence the filter. My comment is meant to be genuine.)

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Bruh. It's not an echo chamber to filter out literal Nazis and other stuff. Ain't nobody changing their mind from "spirited" internet debate and I don't need their garbage in my day.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you really mean "literal Nazis", that tends to support the hypothesis that you're not being exposed to much that contradicts your worldview.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

Tell me more about how you must listen to literal Nazis on a daily basis to contradict your worldview.

And if you don't think Lemmy has or has had to deal with literal Nazis:

Lol

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What instance is "literal Nazis"?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

There are many that were defederated many months ago that aren't even the common ones discussed. I forget some of their names but you can review the defed lists. They are beyond the pale, open open racism, calls for open violence, CP, etc. I'm not talking about some double speak, bad policy maga stuff, I'm talking about cartoons showing minorities as animals, cartoons of lynchings, etc.

The fediverse is a big place.

Edit who the fuck downvotes this

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I was speaking to the general practice of filtering in response to the echo chamber generalization, not the original post calling out instances. Personally I filter out porn instances because that's not what I'm here for. The nice thing about the app I use is that I don't see any posts from those instances but I can choose to see comments because people interacting on the posts I see are generally there for random reasons and are reacting instead of posting their whatever.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I feel like the term echo chamber gets thrown around a lot. Imo an echo chamber has to be highly specific. I wouldn't classify every monolingual person as trapped in an echo chamber for example. I would also argue against to idea of having to be weary of creating your own echo chamber online. Use social media how you like, the solution to echo chambers is going outside and touching grass not forcing yourself to interact with every community on the internet.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's an echo chamber whether you think that's a bad thing or not, only being exposed to one type of view point is what an echo chamber is. And people probably should be exposed to opinions they disagree with, but it doesn't have to be constantly, and it doesn't have to be when they're already stressed or tired, for the sake of their mental health.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Very well put!:-)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I wouldn't classify every monolingual person as trapped in an echo chamber

Simply being something isn't an echo chamber, you have to have a thought or opinion being shared by the group. If every person you interact with only speaks one language, and they all share that one language is the best method of communication, that's an echo chamber.

Use social media how you like

I agree. Although it is useful to be aware of your own biases.

the solution to echo chambers is going outside and touching grass not forcing yourself to interact with every community on the internet.

Assuming you don't mean literally "touch grass", the solution is seeking out opinions/thoughts outside of your echo chamber. That doesn't necessarily mean forcing yourself to interact with terrible communities, but being aware and understanding (but not agreeing with) them.

Although I again refer to using social media how you like is fine. No one needs to be exposed to certain communities. It's not wrong or lazy or bad to ignore certain communities or viewpoints, especially toxic ones. However you should be aware that they exist and it can be helpful, if you choose, to understand where they come from.

As a harmless example, if you don't like brussel sprouts and none of your friends like brussel sprouts, it may benefit you to try brussel sprouts or to seek out and talk to or read about people who like brussel sprouts. You can still at the end of the day dislike brussel sprouts. You don't have to change your opinion. But now your opinion is more well rounded.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

wary=cautious

weary=tired

It's a good comment just trying to help.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Ha, I was tempted to make basically the same comment. I'm super weary of people mixing the two up!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

As if the default Lemmy experience isn't a massive filter bubble in itself. I doubt hardly anyone here would want to federate with Twitter and Truth Social even though that would make your feed, in fact, less of an echo chamber. Hell, a huge number of inctances don't even federate with Hexbear, Lemmygrad or Threads.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think it's pretty much impossible to fully get out of filter bubbles, but the only way to really get every view on everything is to be part of everything mainstream AND everything more underground. Personally, I don't feel the need to associate with any other social media. I think toxicity differs from being exposed to a different point of view.

Reddit has had the problem for years that if you tried to make a point that slightly differed from the hive mind's opinion, however eloquently you would put it, everyone would just pile on with their 'akshually' mentality and not even be open to any other viewpoint than their own.

And that's toxicity without even mentioning folks that would just say 'no' followed by hateful language.

I feel Lemmy is a far kinder, more balanced community where you can have a polite discussion about stuff. And OP is right, if a certain instance shows its users can't behave or have such different views than your own, you can just make them go away and enjoy the rest of Lemmy.

I just hope those users don't defederate from the rest of us so at some point they will have a more nuanced view of things.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I feel Lemmy is a far kinder, more balanced community where you can have a polite discussion about stuff.

My experience has been much closer to what you described reddit to be. Lemmy is extremely unwelcoming of differing opinions.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Disagreeing with your perspective is easy because it’s utterly misguided. Lemmy is a paragon of inclusivity, welcoming all opinions as long as they adhere to basic decency. The platform thrives on a diverse range of ideologies, from anti-capitalist to anarchist, fostering a rich tapestry of debate and discussion. If you find it unwelcoming, maybe it’s because you can't handle being called out for having incorrect views. ^(/s)

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Counterpoint: filtering out the furry communities by blocking a single instance

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly if the furies want to have there own space that's fine. Just don't invade the rest of Lemmy. Same goes for hexbear and whatever else.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Absolutely. I don’t have any hate for them it’s just not my thing and it’s a bit unpleasant when I see it. It’s a great feature for the fediverse that we can filter and let others enjoy their thing in peace.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eating poisoned shit isn't broadening your horizons.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's my philosophy too. I like browsing all so I heavily filter with keywords and blocking. My community block list is approaching 600

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

100%. I don't want to spend my free time scrolling past the political options of every single fuckhead in the world, these topics achieve nothing but pissing each other off. Block, block and block again.

I still remember the old-school crude internet saying of bygone days: "Arguing on the internet is like completing in the special Olympics; even if you win you're still retarded"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm reminded of a quote that goes something like this:

I've been thinking about the free exchange of ideas recently and come to the conclusion that it isn't an open market - it's a potluck.

Everybody brings something to the table and you're free to pick and choose the things that you want to try, but you're not obligated to try everything. Just because Karen put a piece of shit on the table and calls it a sandwich doesn't mean that you have to take a bite to know that it's shit. Similarly, we are not obligated to take white supremacists and other extremists' ideas and seriously debate their value. They're shit and can and should be treated as such.

The beauty of a self-curated experience is that you're free to engage with the things that you want and can ignore the things that you don't want to deal with. The risk of people isolating themselves is simply a part of having the freedom to choose your own experiences, the same as the real world.

Personally, one of the reasons that I'm here is because I have no choice but to deal with right-wing extremism in my daily life, and I don't want to deal with it online as well. Reading news articles? That's fine, but I don't want to see chuds screaming about DEI or woke or whatever in the comments.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This reminds me of Innuendo Studios' latest offering (yes Ian Danskin is sharing some videos again!) Why Don't You Respond To Criticism?.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep. See also: sea-lioning, the gish gallop, and a myriad of other tactics used by the far-right.

Also, another of my favorite quotes:

I'm not doing homework for you. I've known you for 30 seconds and enjoyed exactly none of them.

Self-curating my social media experience is self-care.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Hahaha absolutely yes! That series is hands-down my absolute favorite of all of YouTube, which is really saying something next to the likes of Kurzgesagt and Crash Course series. Also Ian Danskin's other videos like the agency / protagony one - chef's kiss! 😘

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It doesnt necessarily mean that importent things won't be covered. I just don't need fox news opinion about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Maybe the solution is to either not restrict yourself to one platform or to be aware of the bubble.