121
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

This doesn't mean anything, as it's not actually overall net positive. It just makes for a nice headline. But it's just that more energy than the late deposited into the pallet came out of it.

But more energy than to run the lasers or the entire facility? Far, far, far from it.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What if you used the sun as the source of the laser?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That's how Supermans laser eyes work.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

You can! And we do! In fact, then you can skip the whole fusion step, since the sun laser is already powered by fusion, and just collect the energy. I think that tech is called soul... Soul-Harp-N-L.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Using a fusion reactor to power a solar collector to fuel a fusion reactor.

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
121 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
511 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS