this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
244 points (91.2% liked)

Atheist Memes

5532 readers
349 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Other Similar Communities

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think this is bad science. Its important to call out bad science to prove that good science exists.

I don't think all lead is the result of radioactive decay.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Do you have some more reading about this? The wikipedia article doesn't really touch on it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The assumption is that the only way lead can exist is via a series of radioactive decay. It is a way. It is generally created in stars by a much more direct process, not through radioactive decay.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Is there an emperic difference (like the isotope number or whatever) between lead created through radioactive decay and lead created directly in a star?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So the meme is incomplete, but the general point still stands from what I can tell, right? Stars take orders of magnitude longer than 4k years to create lead as well, and there is no way of lead being created that could happen in 4k years, unless you start getting into "God made the universe look old" territory?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, it's created at a cosmic rate in the right sized star.

You'd need to back up and start talking about the big bang and star formation, and at that point lead isn't really part of the argument. Most elements exist as a result of stars smashing atoms as per my understanding.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most elements exist as a result of stars smashing atoms as per my understanding.

In a single star the heaviest element you can make is Iron.

To get anything heavier than Iron, which Lead is, you need your first start to blow up making iron, and the stuff left behind to eventually form a bigger star, then that star needs to blow up (where you'll get some gold, lead and a few other slightly heavier elements. Then the remaining parts of the star need to form a neutron star. You then need that neutron star to find and eventually crash into another neutron star, and thats where you get the really heavy elements like uranium.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So does that imply that Lead has existed in the universe strictly longer than Uranium? Is the meme entirely backwards?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I think it could, yes. Not much (more comes out in the neutron star on neutron star action), but yes some from single large start explosions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Stars take orders of magnitude longer than 4k years to create lead as well, and there is no way of lead being created that could happen in 4k years, unless you start getting into “God made the universe look old” territory?

Thats correct, but the meme is written as a scientific explanation and its is wrong/incomplete. To correct it, go with what you said, not with what the meme says.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, not really defending the meme. I just lazily cross-posted it from [email protected], but the discussion here has been great

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Not really, the original point was to prove the earth isn't 4000 years old. Even if this were the only way lead could be created I'm assuming some portion of the decay could take place in space and then be part of the earth's formation.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Stellar element synthesis is where most elements, iron and below, form. Hydrogen, the most common element, fuses to Helium, Lithium. There are more cycles to stars burning elements, Carbon-Nitrogren-Oxygen Cycle, and a bunch of other stuff, all the way up to Iron. After Iron, nuclear fusion can no longer sustain the star, and it collapses into a neutron star (or any other intermediary ranging from hypothetical quark stars to black holes).

On collapse, you get a supernova. Supernova and other high energy events (called Gamma Ray Bursts, usually attributed to Supernova anyway) explode in a shower of neutrinos and gamma rays. These neutrinos rarely interact with matter since they have no charge, but they still contain a lot of energy, traveling near the speed of light. Gamma rays are the highest energy photons. Anything either particle interacts with will change it.

The collision of the gamma rays burst and nuetrinos with interstellar matter creates the remainder of the elements, much in a similar way we do on earth to create the synthetic elements (like plutonium).

Any isotope can be created this way. Isotopes that are unstable then decay until they become something stable - Uranium -> Lead.

The universe is so old that enough of these elements were able to gather by gravity, forming the relatively tiny deposits we can find on our planet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you want a layman approach then this Youtube video about where gold comes from is pretty good. You can skip most of the first half about the culture of gold. The second half of the video is the creation part.

If you want a technical approach then you want to talk about Rapid Neutron Capture and GRB. You'll find that kind of talk here. Warning: When you start digging deep into scientific explanations you discover that there's more we don't know. As the article ends with the idea that our current working theory of r-process doesn't happen often enough to explain how much gold we have so there's likely at least one other way gold is created in the universe. Welcome to cutting edge science!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don't think or you know??

Big difference

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am not claiming to be a professional particle physicist, and I don't have my high school chemistry textbooks memorized so I can't quote the exact page where Rapid Neutron Capture creates heavier elements that doesn't go immediately to radioactive elements first.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Still does not disprove the above decay chain. So religion is still BULLSHIT.

Just because for and Toyota are different companies doesn't mean they don't both make cars, can make the same thing multiple ways

You can be right too, I surely don't know. But when saying things as fact, the way you think something happens means jack shit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Still does not disprove the above decay chain.

I never said the decay chain was wrong, I said it wasn't the ONLY way lead came into existence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I call it bad science because the meme is suggesting that that is the ONLY way lead exists, therefore the universe is X years old. Its not the only way lead exists, there is a much shorter way. (still way more than 4000 years old)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You are the one stating that. Not the meme. They literally stated just the decay chain time line.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're circling back on what I've already clarified. I'm done. Have a great day!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Hahaha, someone pointed out your error and ya run away