TechTakes

1480 readers

225 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

dgerard@awful.systems

157

Eric Schmidt: ‘We’re not going to hit the climate goals. I’d rather bet on AI solving the problem.’ With "alien intelligence"! (pivot-to-ai.com)

submitted 2 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

80 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kbal@fedia.io 93 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Right, so the plan is to spend 20 years and 40 petawatt hours building a machine to answer the Great ℚuestion of what we should do about climate change. If it works, the answer will be "you should've stopped burning fossil fuels twenty years ago."

[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Oh no what do about all this waste heat?"

"Generate more waste heat"

[–] mountainriver@awful.systems 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Repeat until a machine that can create God is built. Then it's God's problem.

But it must be a US God, otherwise China wins.

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The US god will team up with the Chinese god and the Russian god to beat the crap out of us.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Then the middle eastern god will blow up the indian utopia because he is bored and the british fungus space god will rule over the remains.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This was exactly what I had in mind but for the life of me I can't remember the title.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 2 points 2 months ago

Supergods by warren ellis i think.

[–] corbin@awful.systems 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Surprisingly close to the plot of Illuminatus!, isn't it?

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

I was thinking "I have no mouth and I must scream"

[–] luciole@beehaw.org 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The model will just go "42" on and on and it'll be the first decent joke a neural network produces. It'll be worth it in a way.

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 13 points 2 months ago

I could absolutely see an LLM telling us that 6 times 9 is 42 unless there's special tinkering to prevent it.

[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

"The answer is 34. Now here's the schematics to build an even better computer to ask the right question."