this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
106 points (96.5% liked)

okmatewanker

583 readers
139 users here now

No foul language - i.e. French 🤮

Obviously satire, dozy wankers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
106
Britain was not the... wealthiest of Roman conquests (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

It also required so many soldiers to keep that anyone put in charge of Britannia could take the legions to march on Rome and would have a chance of becoming the new emperor.