this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
37 points (93.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43856 readers
1834 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Earth, the cardinal directions are straightforward. The arrow on a compass points to the nearest magnetic pole. You can then use it to travel anywhere on Earth.

In space, the idea of anything being "central" enough to be used as a "North" (since the universe has no center) or being fixated enough to not somehow pose issues is more convoluted.

If you were a pioneer of space exploration, what would your "North" be?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Probably arbitrarily one of the two vectors perpendicular to the plane of the Milky Way? (Assuming it wasn't necessary for this navigation system to work outside of our galaxy.)

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

planetary, planetary, intergalactic

But seriously, even so, I think it'd be reasonable to still have per-galaxy navigation systems.