13
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

In familiar predicament for famously challenging client, multiple Florida lawyers decline to take Trump’s case, people familiar with the matter say.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I disagree with the trump trials. They are politically charged and set a precedent of arresting your political opponents. I'm not saying he's innocent or guilty but we should consider the bias

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dude he stole highly, highly classified material, didn't give it back when asked, lost some it, and had it stored in a bathroom.

That's far beyond politically charged. Read the indictment. Not all charges brought to politicians are theater. This is absolutely one of those times

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Oh god I wish there is a downvote button here.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Some instances have the downvotes enables some don't.

I got one over here at iusearchlinux.fyi! In fact it's one of the reasons I chose this instance.

The other being haha funny true meme instance name.

EDIT:

Here is a list of instances and what capabilities they each have enabled

https://github.com/maltfield/awesome-lemmy-instances

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I'm using Jerboa and I have a downvote button. I haven't used the browser version much. Does it not have one?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Depends on the instance.

Here's a list of instances and what capabilities they have enabled:

https://github.com/maltfield/awesome-lemmy-instances

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

yeah that's one major downside to lemmy. Forced to see these sort of braindead takes lol

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Honestly, I kind of like if. Stops it from becoming an echo chamber. Refreshing to hear pure, unhinged lunacy, too.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

lol. I mean yeah I get what you are saying, but I know these people exist already because our own politicians are saying the same thing.. Completely ignoring the indictment and that this is just an attack blah blah.. Yet they wont comment on the actual charges. Sad really. Good chance for everyone to talk about how justice will prevail one way or the other through our justice system and that no one is above the law. Instead they are literally saying that the ex president is literally above the law. Need a RL downvote button

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's up to the instance admins to choose if they want to present the downvote button. Use another instance.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I’m sorry, but do you believe that Joe Biden personally had trump arrested? lmao

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They feds gave him a massive amount of opportunity to remedy the issue and has not been charged at all in any way for anything that he gave back. It's only the stuff that he retained after over a year of lying and refusing for which he's being charged. They practically broke their backs twisting around and trying to be as accommodating as possible to give him every possible chance, vastly vastly more patience than if literally anybody else on the planet had done the same, and still he didn't hand it back.

Imagine if he walked out of Target with a TV he didn't pay for, but instead of tackling him or grabbing it they sat there watching as he loaded into is car. They sent him letters as he had people over and told everyone that he got it for free.

Seriously, Trump had classified marking envelopes on display at the bar in Mar-a-lago. We know for a fact he was showing documents to people like the Discord guy. He stole nuclear secrets. He stole national defense information. None of the crimes he's been charged with even require the documents to be explicitly classified, it's enough that the sensitive nature of the documents is sufficient to make possessing them a crime. And yet he kept them by the shitter.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Laws don't care about biases. He didn't break the law because he was Republican, he broke the law because he's a moron. And then he said it on tape. And also on that tape, he said he was breaking the law, and explained how he was doing it.

The simple solution for not getting arrested by political opponents is...don't break the law. I do it every day and I'm yet to be arrested.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

1)Read the indictment. There is a tape where he breaks the law and then acknowledges that’s it’s illegal and proceeds to break the law more. That single law has a sentencing guideline of 10 years.

https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2023/06/trump-indictment.pdf

2)special council is insulated from AG and WH

3)the judge is a trump appointee

4)It doesn’t set a precedent for shit. He broke the law. He will have his day in court.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

So what your saying is presidents should be able to do whatever they want just because they're politicians.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Well no but I am concerned that is will become a pattern. Trump has already stated that he will prosecute biden if he is reelected. I doubt he is going to be reelected but its possible a republican controlled Congress should decide to take biden to court.

I obviously don't support policially charged trials but some conservatives do

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Idk, from my point of view this looks like a result of the DOJ noticing they were missing classified documents and, after attempting to get them back via the usual means aking official requests, they had no choice but to initiate legal action in order to get them back.

Honestly, I doubt the current government had much involvement of at all in this case. Every previous president after receiving official requests for documents in their possession has returned said documents, trump is the first to not do so, and to actively (according to evidence) obstruct the DOJ from regaining said documents.

More likely the politically charged situation, and the current widening political divide has actually made it harder to prosecute this case - One wrong or hasty move at the wrong time and you've got the potential for a even worse repeat of Jan 6th on your hands.

Trying to prosecute a case where the defendant has built a cult of personality around himself is incredibly difficult and infuriatingly so, as the people that make up that cult believes everything said defendant says, and refuses to look at the facts even if they're right in front of them with blaring sirens and flashing lights, doing an Irish jig.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Anything around Trump is politically charged. That doesn't give him carte blanche to flagrantly break the law.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What kind of dumbass opinion is this? Get elected into something and then you're immune to all crimes?... Fuck outa here.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Obviously the trial is going to be charged, as what is happening is unprecedented. Just because it's charged doesn't mean that it is driven by one party party wanting to wipe out their opposition.

In a country with proper separation of power, the juridical system is generally considered independent from the political executive branch. Obviously US has some exceptions to that rule with some judge appointments and such made by government officials, but generally the rule holds true.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What would unbiased accountability look like to you? If the roles were reversed, Trump would be shouting "Lock him up!" in front of crowds every day. No one is doing this to him now (except in jest), because it's expected that his trial be fair.

Read the full indictment. It's clear he understood what he was doing was illegal and he didn't care, and it's clear he was aware it was not in the country's best interest. He was given many chances to make it right and failed to do so. He's been treated more fairly than he'd have done to his political opponents.

He needs to be held accountable. He put himself above the country, and it can't happen like this again. If a federal trial in front of a red state jury isn't fair, I don't know what would satisfy you.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I think it would set an extremely bad precedent if we made it that you can never arrest or try former presidents. Being able to try and hold the president to justice brings us closer to the national ideal of the president being a servant of the people, allowing them to act with legal impunity would bring us closer to the president being a dictator or a king.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I'm not saying that presidents should have a get out if jail free card. However the trials feel a lot like left vs right to me.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If it’s left vs right to you that implies to me you see it as

the left - justice and accountability

the right - grift, fascism, “fuck you i got mine”

Wanna know a secret? you wont be a millionaire.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Then it’s clear you’ve either not paid any attention to the goings on the last 7 or 8 years, or you’re being disingenuous.

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22023 readers
45 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS