32
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

“CCS is a technologically unsound and economically unviable scheme, perpetuated by the fossil fuel industry…”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

That’s like saying “failed alfalfa harvest proves organic farming won’t work”.

How does one leak prove the entire scheme is flawed?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

It's more like saying "the Heisenberg exploded, hydrogen blimps won't work"

The Heisenberg exploded because of ruptured bladders and structural cables snapping, among other things. Hydrogen blimps could work - technologically they're still very feasible

But they're too risky to half ass, and their biggest proponents have shown themselves to be incompetent in the face of the engineering challenges involved

It's not just shit technology - it's about execution. If no one can demonstrate good execution, we have nothing. Better ideas have been killed for less... This whole concept is riddled with unsolved problems - it's not feasible with the players on the board

This is too important to fuck around.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

I think you meant the Hindenburg there.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

It’s uncertain

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Heisenberg exploded? The scientist or the one from Breaking Bad?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah remember when he met Tuco that one time and used exploding meth?

load more comments (10 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
32 points (88.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5055 readers
335 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS