Technology

37707 readers

398 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Kagi is announcing an AI Assistant. (blog.kagi.com)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

tacking on a bunch of LLMs sure is a way to "make the web more human".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’ve used some of these features when I’m trying to skim many articles for my grad school work. It’s not terrible.

There is a use case for this stuff. Especially in a search engine.

Short of hosting your own LLM, Kagi is one of the few I’d hope can get it right and respect privacy. (So far unverified on the AI side tho)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It's not terrible

it sucks at summarising information, though https://www.crikey.com.au/2024/09/03/ai-worse-summarising-information-humans-government-trial/

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's often not a choice between an AI-generated summary and a human-generated one, though. It's a choice between an AI-generated summary and no summary.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

so, no summary at all, or one that does shit job pointing out important bits or gets them wrong and therefore isn't a proper summary? choices, choices.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Kagi actually does an interesting implementation for their search summary and while not perfect, it is miles better than the alternatives in my experience. It uses a combination of anthropic's claude for language processing as well as incorporates wolfram alpha for stuff that needs numerical accuracy. Compared to google AI or copilot I've been seeing good results.

While it isn't perfect at summarizing, I've found their implementation to be "good enough", and it can summarize pieces near instantly, which I think is the place where it actually becomes useful. Humans may be better, but I dont have the money or time to pay a human to summarize pages for me to see if they're going to be useful to delve further into.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Well that’s a bummer. I believe it.