this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
1186 points (98.7% liked)
Technology
59381 readers
3334 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why are Republicans mad about it?!
Because they're driven entirely by emotion, not rationality. They were told to be angry about it, so they are. Plus, Biden or something.
When are they aren't mad? LOL they can die mad for all I care.
Something about limiting consumer choice, but everyone purchased LED bulbs to begin with anyways...
I bet they were equally pissed off when Kmart went out of business.
Tradition
https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelkanellos/2013/08/27/glenn-beck-vows-to-fire-employees-for-buying-fluorescent-bulbs-recyclables/?sh=68c843195181
Because they were born.
because they think we should be burning whale oil
Because imagining that someone might have a legitimate reason to want a product or service that a regulator might not have thought of is currently a "Republican" trait in the US.
Does anybody use incandescent light bulbs as radiators? Because it's the only alternative use I can think of.
In the European Union we banned them 10 years ago and people just continued their lives. I wish people were as mad when books get banned, but sadly it's not the case
Yes. I've done it personally a couple times.
The thing about alternative uses is that they're still real even if you can't think of them.
Broad bans are a bad policy tool in general. Even if you believe in the progressive ideal of expert regulators making broad societal policies, a simple thought experiment shows the problem: What would it take to do the study to accurately determine all the negative effects of a ban? Not guessing, not wishful thinking, but really collecting and analyzing the information.
When was the last time the US federal government banned a book?
Thank you. What is the usage of using them as a radiator? Am I wrong or does it seem quite inefficient?
Regarding your last question: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021%E2%80%932023_book_banning_in_the_United_States
The link seems broken even if I copy-paste it? Wtf. It's a Wikipedia article titled " 2021–2023 book banning in the United States"
Once you're doing resistive heating any resistive element is just as efficient as any other. Incandescent light bulbs have three advantages: They are cheap, easy to work with, and it's really obvious when one is turned on.
As for your link, it's talking about arguments about which books should be made available at school and local libraries. In no sense is that even related to the federal government banning books.
Well I've never said the US federal government is banning books, but I wish people were as mad when their local schools and libraries do that :-)
And what is that legitimate reason here?