politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Source on that?
That doesn't seem like the type of thing where hard evidence would be publically available, honestly.
Actually if you see my other comment, there have been several articles written about it. Tldr; Secret Service can request no more outdoor events but they can’t “deny” the campaign the ability to hold them, and the campaign has vowed to continue to do them.
I'm not totally sure you need a source. I mean, sure, by all means, but I seem to remember from 16 that the secret service was really unhappy with all the outdoor venues and kept harassing the Trump campaign to pick more indoor venues because they're much easier to secure. That's why you almost always see the candidates in indoor rallies, and why Trump has almost exclusively been at indoor venues since the assassination attempt.
The reason I asked for a source is that claim runs counter to statements by the Trump campaign:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-says-he-will-continue-outdoor-rallies-with-increased-secret-service-protection/
https://www.foxnews.com/us/trump-vows-more-outdoor-rallies-says-secret-service-substantially-step-up-after-admitting-failures
In addition, technically the Secret Service can’t really stop him. The relationship between ex-Presidents and candidates and their protection details and actual Presidents is much different.
The Secret Service can request no outdoor events (which they’ve done) but they can’t make the decision.