this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
1147 points (97.3% liked)

Work Reform

9980 readers
130 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (6 children)

In Massachusetts where I'm lucky enough to live, everyone is given at least 12 weeks paid bonding time for birth of a child that can be taken as needed for up to one year after birth of their child. The birthing parents also gets 6-8 weeks of additional paid time. I think some other New England states also have a similar benefits. It's an awesome program that should be modeled around the rest of the nation. Really IMO it should be a full 52 weeks, but I'll take it as a solid starting point

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Isn't that due to Mitt Romney of all people? Part of "Romneycare?" I don't want to give him credit, but that's what I seem to remember.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Actually "Romneycare" is what we call masshealth and it's the ACA before the ACA was national. Essentially mandated but state subsidized health insurance on a sliding scale. The Paid Family Medical Leave with inclusion if bonding time is a different program and only came into effect in the past year or two with an additional payroll tax paid by every employee and employer in MA (it's a pretty tiny surcharge though, and to be transparent you only get 60% of your wages up to a certain amount, I think 1100/wk, while your taking the time). Here's to hoping the federal govt will someday follow.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Thanks for the explanation.

load more comments (3 replies)