this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
663 points (98.8% liked)

News

23376 readers
1995 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Rain is wet, it is not adhered to a solid surface. The middle of the ocean is wet even if there's no solid surface near by.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Isn't it only wet after it touches you? You can anticipate it's wet, but the state would exist after contact.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Aren't the molecules touching other molecules wet if it involves touch?

An individual h2o molecule can't be wet, but if two of them are touching, they are both wet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wet to the touch, not to each other. It changes the property of something else to make it wet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A wall can be wet, it doesn't require a person to touch the wall before it can be called wet. So the sense of touch is not required for something to be wet.

It changes the property of something else to make it wet.

If the wall was dry and I add water to it I have changed this property, if the wall is already wet and I add water to it I have changed nothing. Therefore if I add water to something and do not change its properties then it was already wet in the first place.
If adding water to water does not change its properties then the water was already wet in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As I said, it changes the property of something else, a person does not need to be involved.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As I said, if adding water to water doesn't change the property, then the water was already wet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

That doesn't make sense, it changes other things.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How would you know if it was wet if you’re not around

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If a tree falls in the forest does it make a sound?

I thought we were talking about science, not philosophy.
How do we know the properties of black holes, distract stars, and the early universe if we're not in them?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So a person doesn't have to be physically present and interacting with something in order to know the physical properties of it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think it might be wet somewhere. But I am not there, and I cannot know unless I am there to experience the essence of wetness.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm not going to put much faith into an argument on "what is wet" from someone who isn't sure if a rock on the bottom of a pond is wet unless they reach in and touch it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

I’m not going to allow my eyes to become wet over someone who doesn’t understand that everything has been a joke.