this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
588 points (95.5% liked)

People Twitter

5084 readers
256 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The ONLY legit use for Fahrenheit is when referencing temperature as it applies to human comfort. Outside of that, Celsius is better.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Even then, once you know Celsius it's perfectly effective for that as well.

Source: Grew up on Fahrenheit, learned Celsius for weather five years ago to see how it compares, and still have all my devices on Celsius now. I like it more.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Agree. Grew up and live in the states but read international news, tech stories, science news, etc.

It is just easier for me to remember a little of the metric than stopping to do a conversion each time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Fahrenheit just has more granularity for human comfort. I grew up on F and use C for pretty much everything now, but I still find F better for that one thing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I’d disagree because in day to day life the difference of 1°C is granular enough (a 1F/.5°C difference won’t change my comfort in a meaningful way) and every thermostat that does need that fine of a granularity, usually works in either .5°C or .1°C increments, which are definitely granular enough.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Personally the difference between 68°F and 69°F isn’t all that meaningful, operating in 1.8°F increments hasn’t made comfort less easy to achieve.

But I’m not discounting your opinion, just stating my own. I realize everyone’s experience is different.