It's definitely confusingly presented, but what it's saying is that he's in the group of people that make up the smartest 92% of the population. So 8% are dumber than him.
If you were really wealthy, you might say that you were the top 1%, so 99% are poorer than you. In this case, he's in the top 92% of intelligence wealth, so only 8% have less intelligence than him.
It's definitely confusingly presented, but what it's saying is that he's in the group of people that make up the smartest 92% of the population. So 8% are dumber than him.
If you were really wealthy, you might say that you were the top 1%, so 99% are poorer than you. In this case, he's in the top 92% of intelligence wealth, so only 8% have less intelligence than him.
Other way around. Only 8% have a lower IQ than him.
That's exactly what they said.
This thread is hilarious