this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
612 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19138 readers
3784 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Some Republicans are starting to seriously regret Donald Trump’s vice presidential nominee, Ohio Senator J.D. Vance.

It’s been only one week since Vance was nominated at the Republican National Convention, and already his own party members are expressing severe doubts about Trump’s pick. The former president’s allies have acknowledged that nominating Vance was the product of Trump’s absolute certainty that he would be able to defeat Joe Biden in November. While Vance wouldn’t do much for swing voters or independents, he would likely shore up support among Trump’s base.

But ever since Biden passed the torch to Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic Party’s new presumptive nominee, Republicans have begun to sour on Vance.

“The road got a lot harder. He was the only pick that wasn’t the safe pick. And I think everyone has now realized that,” one House Republican told Axios Thursday, under the condition of anonymity.

Another House Republican told Axios that Vance “doesn’t add much.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 238 points 3 months ago (16 children)

Are we talking about JD Vance the couch fucker?

[–] [email protected] 195 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The sectional predator himself

[–] [email protected] 82 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"I did not have sectional relations with that sofa"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

"Sectional" fuckin hell dude 🤣

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

God damn, couch - that's some hoe shit!

[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 months ago

Holy fuck, thank you for that laugh

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Again, there is ZERO evidence that JD Vance has reached earth-shattering orgasm in the loving embrace of a two-piece sectional, or that he has had a wild fling or two with wicker outdoor patio furniture. NONE. He certainly has not done so while making disgusting claims about gay people.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago

I have the evidence that shows it is all true right here.

Evidence

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

This is probably how furries became popular. People saw that Monty Python skit about the mice men and thought it was funny and started dressing up.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 3 months ago

Does JD fuck couches? A lot of people are saying it. The best people. They keep saying it so there must be some truth to it. Just the other day I asked him so you prefer leather, right? It's so smooth. It's durable. It's perfect! He looked me dead in the eye and said, "polyester". It's so rough though! That's why he needs the glove!

[–] [email protected] 47 points 3 months ago (1 children)

i adore that he will live out the rest of his days being known as j.d. the couch fucking mascara muffin man vance

[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 months ago

JD "Nothing finer than a sofa recliner" Vance

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago

More cushion for the pushin!

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’m late to the party. What’s up with all that couch fucking?

[–] [email protected] 50 points 3 months ago (3 children)

There was a made-up rumor that his book has an excerpt about fucking a couch...But the memes have been fire so no one cares that it's false. He's now a couch fucker.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

You can build a million bridges, but you fuck one single couch, no one calls you a bridge builder.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Made up is just another way to say republikkklown speak.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean we can't prove that he hasn't fucked a couch. If they can believe dumb shit like pizzagate, qanon and the stuff that comes out of Trump's mouth we can keep the couch fucker memes going for the lolz.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lots of people are saying it, and he has not refuted it. We know it's true.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ok that’s pretty fucking funny. Has anybody already made R34 of that?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You're welcome to go look, I'm certainly not going to.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

That's so gross. Which websites though?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago

Live action bigmouth confirmed, unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

He prefers the term Furniture Fondler.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think he's a natural pairing with Donald Trump, the philanderer. They can bring one girl back home without it getting "weird."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Richard Gere's gerbil approved

load more comments (5 replies)