this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
1100 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19126 readers
3363 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (3 children)

You can win in multiple different ways, not simply picking a purple state moderate. The whole reason there's a story about "more youth voters like Harris" is because more youth voters could help her win. And the youths notably live in every swing state.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (4 children)

The youth are not historically known for showing up to vote.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's what the media says, but kids these days are showing up more than their parents were at their age.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

I just hope it's enough.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

There's an increasing trend, though. The last couple elections have been pivotal. Sucks we didn't turn out in 2016, but we're learning. Young women telling young men you ain't getting laid while abortion is illegal. LGBT+ saying you won't take our healthcare. New parents saying we need universal childcare, college students saying debt forgiveness is essential.

I don't know if it'll be enough, but I know I'll never miss an election again, at least

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

"The youth are notorious for low turnout. That's why Kamala Harris (and possibly her VP) increasing their turnout isn't important."

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

More like being popular with a demographic who doesn't show up to vote hasn't historically been a good way to win elections.

If they actually show up this time, awesome.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Biden literally won in 2020 with strong youth turnout while Clinton lost in 2016 with a weak one. Historically, youth turnout is extremely important for Democrats, and people continually dismissing their value will only harm that effort.

https://circle.tufts.edu/latest-research/half-youth-voted-2020-11-point-increase-2016

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

No one is dismissing their value. It's exciting to see them energized. The youth vote has been trending up and that's awesome for many reasons. But we may need another election or two to see if it will hold or if it's a reaction to Trump that will revert to norms once he's gone.

If it holds, I think we are likely to see some changes in political calculus.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

This is the problem. You're demanding that young voters just naturally show up for multiple voting cycles before you think politicians should try to court them. Why on earth would you expect that to work? Would you expect that to work for black voters or women? Voter motivation doesn't rise and fall based on its own, it's something politicians actively work to inspire. It wasn't an accident that Obama had great turnout and Clinton had poor turnout.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Maybe the party should continue to listen to them. That seems to be working.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And yet they're excited right now because the party was responsive to their concerns.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Let's hope they stay excited.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Let's hope the party remains responsive, then.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Smoke and mirrors. Right now we need the clearest path to victory, not a path. The Right has their strengths and one of them is throwing wrenches into things. Can't throw a stick into my spokes if my bike doesn't have any.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And youths are also notorious for not turning out too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And yet, they seem motivated to vote for Harris because the party stopped lecturing and listened instead.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I feel like i heard those same people say she was too moderate before.

Funny how that changes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And yet they rallied behind her. Guess the centrist narrative about progressives wanting absolute perfection and purity testing everything to death was horseshit from the very beginning, and that progressives are willing to accept a reasonable compromise candidate when the party isn't too stubborn and arrogant to listen.

Now since we're talking about things people said before Biden dropped out, where's all the chaos that Biden stans were predicting?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Thankfully not there.

Wanna gloat more? I'll pull up a million comments of yours. Go for it. Douche

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Have a party.

You wanted to stick with a losing candidate.