this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
366 points (97.4% liked)

News

23376 readers
3521 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

automated objective scoring

You didn't read my post. You're strawmanning. Not your style.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Automated by whom? Objective according to whom?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You're still bashing that straw man you made.

Look up. You made a mistake. And, if it wasn't you I'd simply block.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Bud, that isn't what a straw man is. Like, at all.

And "objective computer analysis" can still be wrong and biased. Look at all the image classifiers that called black people monkeys cause they were trained almost exclusively on images of white people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You could answer my questions or you could keep trolling up to you.

Also, please do explain how asking you how this test would be automated and objective is a straw man. Do you not understand what a straw man argument is?

Also, stop making this about me. If you want to block me, fine, but I don't care about your expectations of me or what you think is a mistake or poor argument on my part.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why would I involuntarily defend a position I do not hold because some idiot can't be bothered to use the reading comprehension and social skills I know they have?

please do explain how asking you how this test would be automated and objective is a straw man

Because I don't believe in a test. I've told you twice. But, you're uncharacteristically being a jackass, now even after you've slept on it.

I'll make it about you because you're a valuable member of the community whom I respect, and who's seemingly not meeting their own standards of behavior (based on the past). If you don't like it, block. I'm pretty close.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Actually, I went back and you told me once, which I did miss. The other one was an edit which you somehow expected me to see after I replied to you. And then, even though I missed your claim that it shouldn't happen, you kept arguing for how the test could be implemented.

So I don't think you know what you are arguing for.

And I still don't care about what you think of me or of my value to anyone. First of all because I don't have any value to anyone and secondly because your opinion of me won't change that.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I made no argument for a test. I answered your direct question as to how it could be done fairly.

Reading and comprehension is prerequisite to a good faith response. You skipped half a post then needed to be told twice to read it. It's not my responsibility to coddle you into good faith. I delivered content well within your capacity to understand.

I accept no responsibility for your error. The input was far better than what you usually receive. You just wanted to fight with someone and I was next in line. You're a public figure. We all know your MO.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I made no argument for a test.

Your words in your initial post before you made your edit:

In order to vote, I think American voters should have to pass the same history test that immigrants need to in order to gain citizenship

So now you're just lying.

And also, I'm just going to stop reading your posts at the point you start to make them personal. You really aren't getting that I don't give a shit what you think of me.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

That's not an argument. It's a statement. Is your bar really that low or are you still just trying to fight?

I won't fight with you. I know too much about you. We've spoken personally on three accounts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Now you're gaslighting. Statements can be arguments and "I think" statements are arguments because you are giving an opinion. Which I am sure you know, so I'm not sure why you're trying this tack.